| |
| |

|
TRÁI TIM
MẸ: NƠI CON NƯƠNG NÁU - ĐƯỜNG ĐẾN VỚI CHÚA |
|
"Chúa Giêsu muốn dùng con để làm
cho Mẹ được nhận biết và yêu mến" |
|
December 29, 2008
–
Monday in
Christmas Octave
DAILY LITURGICAL/THEME MEDITATION:
"This child is set for the
fall and rising of many"
UNIVERSAL CHURCH/WORLD EVENT(S):
BETHLEHEM'S DIVINE LIGHT SPREAD OUT OVER ALL THE EARTH;
POPE RECALLS STEPHEN, ASKS LIBERATION OF THOSE
SEQUESTERED;
GIVING WITNESS TO THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FAMILY
URGENT CALL FOR PEACE IN THE HOLY LAND
SAINT OF THE DAY
St. Thomas Becket
GENERAL
MARIOLOGY
Mary and the Fathers of the Church
The
Christian Controversialists
DIVINE MERCY
On Humility, Humiliation
The depth of Jesus' Meekness and
Humility
TEACHING/TESTIMONY/CONVICTION:
INSTRUCTION
DIGNITAS PERSONAE
ON CERTAIN BIOETHICAL
QUESTIONS
Second
Part:
New
Problems Concerning Procreation
Techniques for
assisting fertility
Monthly Index

|
|
DAILY LITURGICAL MEDITATION |
|
Monday (12/29): "This child is set for the
fall and rising of many"
Scripture: Luke 2:22-35
22 And when the time came for their purification according to the law
of Moses, they brought him up to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord 23
(as it is written in the law of the Lord, "Every male that opens the
womb shall be called holy to the Lord") 24 and to offer a sacrifice
according to what is said in the law of the Lord, "a pair of
turtledoves, or two young pigeons." 25 Now there was a man in Jerusalem,
whose name was Simeon, and this man was righteous and devout, looking
for the consolation of Israel, and the Holy Spirit was upon him. 26 And
it had been revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he should not see
death before he had seen the Lord's Christ. 27 And inspired by the
Spirit he came into the temple; and when the parents brought in the
child Jesus, to do for him according to the custom of the law, 28 he
took him up in his arms and blessed God and said, 29 "Lord, now lettest
thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word; 30 for mine
eyes have seen thy salvation 31 which thou hast prepared in the presence
of all peoples, 32 a light for revelation to the Gentiles, and for glory
to thy people Israel." 33 And his father and his mother marveled at what
was said about him; 34 and Simeon blessed them and said to Mary his
mother, "Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising of many in
Israel, and for a sign that is spoken against 35 (and a sword will
pierce through your own soul also), that thoughts out of many hearts may
be revealed."
Meditation: Is your life in tune with the Holy Spirit? Simeon
was a man who was just towards others and devout towards God. He gladly
accepted the mission God called him to perform with much fervent prayer
and with patient expectation. His whole life was in tune with the Holy
Spirit. His was found daily in the temple in prayer and worship and in
humble and faithful expectation for the day that the Lord would comfort
his people. As the days and months grew into years he never lost hope.
When Joseph and Mary presented the child Jesus in the temple, Simeon
immediately recognized the Lord’s presence in his temple. Through eyes
of faith he say the infant Jesus as the fulfillment of all the messianic
prophecies, hopes, and prayers of the people of Israel. Inspired by the
Holy Spirit he prophesied that Jesus was to be "a revealing light to the
Gentiles". Jesus came not only as “light and salvation” for the people
of Israel, but for all nations as well.
Jesus is the new temple (John 1:14; 2:19-22). In the Old Testament
God manifested his presence in the “pillar of cloud” by day and the
“pillar of fire” by night as he led them through the wilderness. God’s
glory visibly came to dwell over the ark and the tabernacle (Exodus
40:34-38). When the first temple was build in Jerusalem God’s glory came
to rest there (1 Kings 8). After the first temple was destroyed, Ezekiel
saw God’s glory leave it (Ezekiel 10). But God promised one day to fill
it with even greater glory (Haggai 2:1-9; Zechariah 8-9). That promise
is fulfilled when the “King of Glory” himself comes to his temple (Psalm
24:7-10; Malachi 3:1). Through Jesus’coming in the flesh and through
his saving death, resurrection, and ascension we are made living temples
of his Holy Spirit (1 Cor. 3:16-17). Do you recognize that you are God’s
temple and that his Spirit dwells within you?
Simeon blessed Mary and Joseph and he prophesied to Mary about the
destiny of this child and the suffering she would undergo for his sake.
There is a certain paradox for those blessed by the Lord. Mary was given
the blessedness of being the mother of the Son of God. That blessedness
also would become a sword which pierced her heart as her Son died upon
the cross. She received both a crown of joy and a cross of sorrow. But
her joy was not diminished by her sorrow because it was fueled by her
faith, hope, and trust in God and his promises. Jesus promised his
disciples that "no one will take your joy from you" (John 16:22). The
Lord gives us a supernatural joy which enables us to bear any sorrow or
pain and which neither life nor death can take way. Do you know the joy
of a life fully surrendered to God with faith and trust?
"Lord Jesus, may I recognize your visitation and be prepared for your
action today, just as Simeon Anna were prepared and ready to respond to
your visitation and action in their day."
Psalm 96:1-6
1 O sing to the LORD a new song; sing to the LORD, all the earth.
2 Sing to the LORD, bless his name; tell of his salvation from day to
day.
3 Declare his glory among the nations, his marvelous works among all the
peoples.
4 For great is the LORD, and greatly to be praised; he is to be revered
above all gods.
5 For all the gods of the peoples are idols, but the LORD made the
heavens.
6 Honor and majesty are before him; strength and beauty are in his
sanctuary.
RETURN
TO TOP
|
|
UNIVERSAL CHURCH/WORLD EVENTS |
BETHLEHEM'S DIVINE LIGHT
SPREAD OUT OVER ALL THE
EARTH
VATICAN CITY, 25 DEC
2008 (VIS) - At noon
today, the Solemnity of
the Nativity of the
Lord, the Pope gave his
traditional Christmas
message and imparted the
"Urbi et Orbi" blessing
from the central loggia
of the Vatican Basilica.
Extracts of the message
are given below:
"Every Christmas crib
is a simple yet eloquent
invitation to open our
hearts and minds to the
mystery of life. It is
an encounter with the
immortal Life which
became mortal in the
mystic scene of the
Nativity ".
"This
proclamation of hope -
the heart of the
Christmas message - is
meant for all men and
women. Jesus was born
for everyone, and just
as Mary, in Bethlehem,
offered Him to the
shepherds, so on this
day the Church presents
Him to all humanity, so
that each person and
every human situation
may come to know the
power of God’s saving
grace, which alone can
transform evil into
good, which alone can
change human hearts,
making them oases of
peace".
"May the many people
who continue to dwell in
darkness and the shadow
of death (cf. Lk 1:79)
come to know the power
of God’s saving grace!
May the divine Light of
Bethlehem radiate
throughout the Holy
Land, where the horizon
seems once again bleak
for Israelis and
Palestinians. May it
spread throughout
Lebanon, Iraq, and the
whole Middle East. May
it bring forth rich
fruit from the efforts
of all those who, rather
than resigning
themselves to the
twisted logic of
conflict and violence,
prefer instead the path
of dialogue and
negotiation as the means
of resolving tensions
within each country and
finding just and lasting
solutions to the
conflicts troubling the
region".
"This light, which
brings transformation
and renewal, is besought
by the people of
Zimbabwe, in Africa,
trapped for all too long
in a political and
social crisis which,
sadly, keeps worsening,
as well as the men and
women of the Democratic
Republic of Congo,
especially in the
war-torn region of Kivu,
Darfur, in Sudan, and
Somalia, whose
interminable sufferings
are the tragic
consequence of the lack
of stability and peace.
This light is awaited
especially by the
children living in those
countries, and the
children of all
countries experiencing
troubles, so that their
future can once more be
filled with hope".
"Wherever the dignity
and rights of the human
person are trampled
upon; wherever the
selfishness of
individuals and groups
prevails over the common
good; wherever
fratricidal hatred and
the exploitation of man
by man risk being taken
for granted; wherever
internecine conflicts
divide ethnic and social
groups and disrupt
peaceful coexistence;
wherever terrorism
continues to strike;
wherever the basics
needed for survival are
lacking; wherever an
increasingly uncertain
future is regarded with
apprehension, even in
affluent nations: in
each of these places may
the Light of Christmas
shine forth and
encourage all people to
do their part in a
spirit of authentic
solidarity. If people
look only to their own
interests, our world
will certainly fall
apart".
"Dear brothers and
sisters, today, 'the
grace of God our Saviour
has appeared' (cf. Tit
2:11) in this world of
ours, with all its
potential and its
frailty, its advances
and crises, its hopes
and travails. Today,
there shines forth the
light of Jesus Christ".
"God has come to meet
us; He has shown us His
face, full of grace and
mercy! May His coming to
us not be in vain! Let
us seek Jesus, let us be
drawn to His light which
dispels sadness and fear
from every human heart.
Let us draw near to Him
with confidence, and bow
down in humility to
adore him. Merry
Christmas to all!".
Following his message,
the Pope extended
Christmas greetings in
64 languages and
imparted the "Urbi et
Orbi" (to Rome and the
world) blessing.
MESS/URBI ET ORBI/...
VIS 081229 (630)
POPE RECALLS STEPHEN,
ASKS LIBERATION OF THOSE
SEQUESTERED
VATICAN CITY, 26 DEC
2008 (VIS) - At noon
today, on the Feast of
St. Stephen, Protomartyr,
the Holy Father appeared
at the widow of his
study to pray the
Angelus with thousands
of pilgrims gathered in
St. Peter's Square.
In the account of the
martyrdom of St.
Stephen, the Pope said,
there is a detail that
"during this Pauline
Year should be
highlighted: the note
that 'the witnesses laid
down their cloaks at the
feet of a young man
named Saul'".
The Holy Father
observed, "St. Paul
appears here for the
first time, with his
Hebrew name of Saul, in
the role of a zealous
persecutor of the
Church. ... Shortly
after the martyrdom of
St. Stephen and still
driven by his zeal
against Christians, Saul
was struck down by a
light from heaven, the
extraordinary experience
in which the risen
Christ appeared to him,
spoke to him, and
changed his life".
"Saul persecuted the
Church and had even
participated in the
stoning of Stephen. He
saw him stoned to death
but above all had seen
the way in which he
died, ever like Christ,
that is, praying and
forgiving his killers.
On the road to Damascus
Saul understood that in
persecuting the Church
he was persecuting Jesus
who had died and truly
risen; Jesus, alive in
His Church, was also
alive in Stephen who he
had seen die but who now
certainly lived together
with his risen Lord. We
can almost say that in
Christ's voice he heard
that of Stephen and, as
well as by his
intercession, divine
grace touched his
heart".
"In St. Stephen",
Benedict XVI concluded,
"we see come to fruition
the first fruits of the
salvation that the
Nativity of Christ
offered to humanity: the
victory of life over
death, of love over
hate, of the light of
truth over the darkness
of deception. We give
thanks to God that this
victory still today
allows many Christians
not to return evil with
evil, but to respond
with the strength of
truth and love".
After praying the
Angelus the Pope gave
the following words: "At
Christmastime our
concern for those who
find themselves in
conditions of suffering
or great difficulty is
heightened. I think,
among others, of the two
consecrated Italian
women, Maria Teresa
Olivero and Caterina
Giraudo, belonging to
the Father de Foucauld
Contemplative Missionary
Movement, who have been
held hostage for over a
month and a half,
together with a group of
local members, in the
village of El Waq in
Northern Kenya. I want
them to feel the
solidarity of the Pope
and all the Church in
these moments. May the
Lord who, being born,
came to give us His love
reach the heart of the
kidnappers, that they
free our sisters so that
they might return to
their selfless service
with our poorest
brothers and sisters! I
invite you to pray for
this without forgetting
the many persons held
hostage in other places
around the world, of
whom we do not always
have clear news: I am
thinking of those held
hostage for political as
well as other reasons in
Latin America, the
Middle East, and
Africa".
ANG/STEPHEN:
HOSTAGES/...
VIS
081229 (520)
GIVING WITNESS TO THE
IMPORTANCE OF THE FAMILY
VATICAN CITY, 28 DEC
2008 (VIS) - At noon
today, the Feast of the
Holy Family of Nazareth,
the Pope addressed the
thousands who had
gathered in St. Peter's
Square to pray the
Angelus.
The Holy Father
affirmed that "the
family of Jesus truly
merits the title 'holy'
because its sole desire
was to fulfil the will
of God, incarnate in the
adorable presence of
Jesus. On the one hand,
it is a family like all
others and as such is a
model of conjugal love,
collaboration,
sacrifice, trust in
Divine Providence,
industriousness,
solidarity, of all those
values safeguarded and
promoted by the family,
contributing in a basic
way to the formation of
the fabric of every
society".
"At the same time", he
continued, "the family
of Nazareth is unique,
different from all
others because of its
singular vocation tied
to the mission of the
Son of God. Precisely
with this uniqueness it
signals to all families,
Christian families
primarily, the horizon
of God, the sweet and
demanding primacy of His
will, the perspective of
heaven to which we are
destined".
Benedict XVI then
addressed the thousands
of persons gathered in
Madrid's Plaza de Colon
who were participating
in a celebration to
"pray for the family and
dedicate themselves to
work in support of it
with strength and hope".
The family", he said,
"is certainly a grace of
God, which allows what
He Himself is to be
revealed: Love. An
eternally gratuitous
love that sustains
faithfully and without
limits, even in moments
of difficulty or
discouragement. These
qualities are eminently
incarnate in the Holy
Family in which Jesus
came to the world and
was raised, coming to
wisdom with the
thoughtful care of Mary
and the faithful
tutelage of St. Joseph".
"Dear families", he
continued, "do not let
love, openness to life,
and the incomparable
bonds that unite your
home be corrupted. Ask
this continually of the
Lord, praying together,
that your intentions be
illuminated by faith and
exalted by divine grace
on the path toward
holiness. In this way,
with the joy of sharing
everything in love, you
will give the world a
beautiful witness of how
important the family is
for the human being and
for society. The Pope is
by your side, asking
especially of the Lord
for those in each family
who have the greatest
needs of health, work,
comfort, and
companionship".
The Holy Father
concluded, recalling
that the 6th World
Encounter of Families
will take place in
Mexico City from 14 to
18 January 2009. "Let us
pray for this important
ecclesial event,
entrusting all family to
the Lord, especially
those most affected by
the difficulties of life
and by the wounds of
incomprehension and
division. May the
Redeemer, born in
Bethlehem, give to all
the serenity and
strength of walking
united the path of
good."
ANG/FAMILIES/...
VIS
081229 (460)
URGENT CALL FOR PEACE IN
THE HOLY LAND
VATICAN CITY, 28 DEC
2008 (VIS) - After
praying the Angelus
today the Pope called
for an end to the
violence in the Holy
Land and asked the
international community
to do everything
possible to help
Israelis and
Palestinians find a
solution to the current
conflict.
"The Holy Land, which
occupies the thoughts
and sentiments of
faithful around the
world during these days
of Christmas", the Holy
Father said, "has again
seen itself struck by an
outbreak of
unprecedented violence".
"I am profoundly
saddened by the deaths,
the wounded, the
material damage, the
suffering, and the tears
of the peoples victim to
this tragic recurrence
of attacks and
reprisals".
"The earthly homeland
of Jesus", he exclaimed,
"cannot continue being
witness to such
bloodshed that is
repeated without end! I
implore an end to the
violence, which is to be
condemned in all its
forms, and the
re-establishment of the
truce in the Gaza Strip.
I ask for a show of
humanity and wisdom in
all those who have some
responsibility in this
situation. I ask the
international community
to do everything
possible to help the
Israelis and
Palestinians out of this
dark alley and not to
resign themselves - as I
said a few days ago in
the 'Urbi et Orbi'
message - to the twisted
logic of confrontation
and violence, but to
give precedence to the
path of dialogue and
negotiation".
"We entrust to Jesus,
the Prince of Peace", he
concluded, "our fervent
prayer for these
intentions, and to Him,
Mary, and Joseph we say:
'Oh family of Nazareth,
expert in suffering,
grant peace to the
world'. Grant it today,
above all, to the Holy
Land!".
ANG/CALL FOR PEACE/HOLY
LAND
VIS
081229 (270)
RETURN
TO TOP
|
|
DAILY LITURGICAL SAINT |
|
December 29, 2008

St. Thomas Becket

(1118-1170)
A strong man who wavered for a moment, but then learned one cannot come
to terms with evil and so became a strong churchman, a martyr and a
saint—that was Thomas Becket, archbishop of Canterbury, murdered in his
cathedral on December 29, 1170.
His career had been a stormy one. While archdeacon of Canterbury, he was
made chancellor of England at the age of 36 by his friend King Henry II.
When Henry felt it advantageous to make his chancellor the archbishop of
Canterbury, Thomas gave him fair warning: he might not accept all of
Henry’s intrusions into Church affairs. Nevertheless, he was made
archbishop (1162), resigned his chancellorship and reformed his whole
way of life!
Troubles began. Henry insisted upon usurping Church rights. At one time,
supposing some conciliatory action possible, Thomas came close to
compromise. He momentarily approved the Constitutions of Clarendon,
which would have denied the clergy the right of trial by a Church court
and prevented them from making direct appeal to Rome. But Thomas
rejected the Constitutions, fled to France for safety and remained in
exile for seven years. When he returned to England, he suspected it
would mean certain death. Because Thomas refused to remit censures he
had placed upon bishops favored by the king, Henry cried out in a rage,
“Will no one rid me of this troublesome priest!” Four knights, taking
his words as his wish, slew Thomas in the Canterbury cathedral.
Thomas Becket remains a hero-saint down to our own times.
Comment:
No one becomes a saint without struggle, especially with himself. Thomas
knew he must stand firm in defense of truth and right, even at the cost
of his life. We also must take a stand in the face of pressures—against
dishonesty, deceit, destruction of life—at the cost of popularity,
convenience, promotion and even greater goods.
Quote:
In T.S. Eliot's drama, Murder in the Cathedral, Becket faces a
final temptation to seek martyrdom for earthly glory and revenge. With
real insight into his life situation, Thomas responds:
"The last temptation is the greatest treason: To do the right deed for
the wrong reason."
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
GENERAL
MARIOLOGY |
Mary and the
Fathers of the Church
By
Fr. Luigi Gambero, S.M.
The
following article is an excerpt from the recently published Marian
anthology, Mariology: A Guide
for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons, Seat of
Wisdom Books, A Division of Queenship, 2008. Fifteen international
Mariology experts contributed to the text. The book features a foreword
by Archbishop Raymond L. Burke and has 17 chapters divided into four
parts: 1. Mary in Scripture and the Early Church; 2. Marian Dogma; 3.
Marian Doctrine; and 4. Marian Liturgy and Devotion. The book is now
available from Queenship Publications. To obtain a copy, visit
queenship.org.
Visit
books.google.com and search on "Mariology: A Guide" to view the book
in its entirety, or simply
click here.
Asst. Ed.
(continued)
The Christian Controversialists
The
Christian controversialists of the third century left more powerful
works, not only in order to defend Christian faith, but also to attack
the errors of its opponents. In doing so, they had the opportunity to
explain also the orthodox doctrine of faith. These authors had a more
direct and determinative influence in the process, at the outset of
Christian theology. The Fathers and the Christian writers of this period
began (however infrequently), to write on Mary to deal with her person
and her mission in salvation history. Usually they speak of Mary in
other contexts, for instance, explaining and commenting on Holy
Scripture, dealing with the mystery of the Incarnation or with the
person of Jesus Christ, illustrating the life and mission of the Church.
Among
them St. Irenaeus of Lyons (+ after 178) was foremost, and we
concentrate our attention on him. His origins are from Asia Minor, maybe
from Smyrna, because in one of his letters he wrote to the Roman
presbyter Florinus that in his early youth he had listened to the
sermons of Polycarp. Later, for unknown reasons, he left his country and
moved to Gaul where he became a presbyter of the church of Lyons and
later on bishop, succeeding Photinus who had died as a martyr.
His
masterpiece is a five-volume work entitled Adversus Haereses,
whose original version in Greek is no longer extant, but of which we
have a very ancient Latin version made in Northern Africa, probably
before 258. He fights heresy, especially the many branches of
Gnosticism; but to these heresies he also presents the orthodox teaching
of the Church. Another work we have from him, but only in an Armenian
version, is the Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching (21).
The
Marian teaching of Irenaeus does not appear like a kerygmatic
proclamation, but rather as a true theological and dogmatic reflection.
In fact, his development and deepening of the Eve-Mary parallel can be
rightly considered the starting point of the theology on Mary. To enter
this question, we have to refer to one of the foundations of Irenaeus’
Christology and soteriology, namely the principle of recapitulation (anakephalaiosis).
This term, meaning "summing up," is used in its verbal form in Ephesians
1:10, where God is said to sum up all things in Christ.
Irenaeus further elaborated on the term and applied it to Christ who,
through his obedience, restored fallen humanity to communion with God by
taking upon himself all things since the beginning. In other words, God
rehabilitates the earlier divine plan of salvation for mankind, which
was interrupted by the fall of Adam, and gathers up his entire work from
the beginning to renew, to restore, to reorganize it in his Son, who,
therefore, through his Incarnation, became the second Adam. This further
elaboration is based on other Pauline texts which establish a parallel
between Adam and Christ (Rom 5:12-21; 1 Cor 15:21-22, 45-49) and
presents the work of salvation as a new creation, a repetition of the
first one, and the Savior himself as a New Adam. Since by the fall of
man the whole human race was lost, the Son of God had to become a man so
that the plan of salvation, or the second creation, could be fulfilled
in the same way that the first creation was frustrated (22). This
recapitulation has two great results: a negative one, consisting in the
fact that the effects of the disobedience of the first Adam, namely sin
and death, are destroyed (23), because Christ, the second Adam, through
his obedience, renewed the ancient conflict against the Devil and
overcame him (24). The positive effect is that the whole of mankind was
renewed and restored in the second Adam (25).
In
the framework of the recapitulation of all things in Christ, the role of
the Virgin Mary is explained by means of the Eve-Mary parallel. For the
first time, Irenaeus gives a theological content to this analogy, so
that in it we find the first and most ancient theological reflection on
the Mother of God. In his writings, we find three passages asserting
this parallelism. By reading the three texts in chronological succession
we can better understand the progressive development of his thought.
In
the first text the Bishop of Lyons does not touch the parallel casually,
as Justin did, but he rather makes of it a source for deep theological
reflection. We notice that the parallelism between Eve and Mary is
perfectly constructed in the form of a sharp antithesis. Eve and Mary
were still virgins when they received God’s message, though they already
had a husband. Eve disobeyed God; Mary obeyed; and so Eve’s disobedience
became the cause of death both to herself and to the whole human race,
whereas Mary’s obedience became the cause of salvation (causa salutis)
both to herself and to all mankind. Eve’s disobedience tightened knots
around our liberty; Mary’s obedience set us free from such knots. Eve’s
disobedience follows from her unbelief; Mary’s obedience is caused by
her faith:
Even
though Eve had Adam for a husband, she was still a virgin…. By
disobeying, she became the cause of death for herself and for the whole
human race. In the same way, Mary, though she also had a husband, was
still a virgin, and by obeying, she became the cause of salvation for
herself and for the whole human race. … The knot of Eve’s disobedience
was untied by Mary’s obedience. What Eve bound through her unbelief,
Mary loosed by her faith (26).
In
the second passage, the Eve-Mary antithesis is set side-by-side with the
Adam-Christ parallel. From the antithetic role of Christ in regard to
Adam and that of Mary in regard to Eve, Irenaeus draws the conclusion
that the Virgin Mary became the advocate (advocata) of the virgin
Eve, balancing by her obedience the disobedience of Eve, as Jesus
through his correction amended the sin of Adam. Thus Irenaeus not only
puts the role of Mary within Christ’s redemptive plan, but he also
clearly explains that Mary has a function strictly joined with Christ’s
function, as Eve did with Adam:
Eve
was seduced by the word of the (fallen) angel and transgressed God’s
word, so that she fled from him. In the same way, (Mary) was evangelized
by the word of an angel and obeyed God’s word, so that she carried him
(within her). And while the former was seduced into disobeying God, the
latter was persuaded to obey God, so that the Virgin Mary became the
advocate (advocata) of the virgin Eve.
And
just as the human race was bound to death because of a virgin, so it was
set free from death by a Virgin, since the disobedience of one virgin
was counterbalanced by a Virgin’s obedience.
If,
then, the first-made man’s sin was mended by the right conduct of the
first-born Son (of God), and if the serpent’s cunning was bested by the
simplicity of the dove (Mary), and if the chains that held us bound to
death have been broken, then the heretics are fools; they are ignorant
of God’s economy, and they are unaware of his economy for (the salvation
of) man (27).
We
also notice that the role of Mary does not only parallel the role of
Eve; much more, it interferes in the plan of Eve, since Mary directly
overcomes the guile of the serpent with her simplicity.
The
third text comes from the Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching.
Here Irenaeus stresses the concepts both of death and life. Death comes
from the disobedience of Eve, life from the obedience of Mary:
Adam
had to be recapitulated in Christ, so that death might be swallowed up
in immortality, and Eve (had to be recapitulated) in Mary, so that the
Virgin, having become another virgin’s advocate, might destroy and
abolish one virgin’s disobedience by the obedience of another virgin
(28).
Further on, Irenaeus justifies the fact that the Lord took his body from
the Virgin Mary, a descendant of Adam, instead of becoming incarnate in
a creature extraneous to us, because the work of salvation had to be
achieved within the same human race.
Irenaeus’ insistence on this parallelism ought to be explained by his
concern to refute the error of Tatian, a Christian apologist of Gnostic
tendency, former disciple of St. Justin and founder of the sect of the
Encratites. He is the author of the Diatessaron, a kind of
synopsis of the four gospels. Irenaeus argues against him that Adam and
Eve, after their sin, recovered grace and the friendship of God. He
could not accept that our ancestors were damned, and accused Tatian of
being guilty of this heresy. Irenaeus wants to demonstrate that both
Adam and Eve were saved by Christ, in anticipation of his redemptive
work, in which Mary had her own role to play. In this economy the human
race receives a new progenitor, in place of the first Adam. But since
the first woman was also implicated in the fall by her disobedience, the
work of salvation starts also by the obedience of a woman. Giving life
to the New Adam, she becomes the New Eve, the true Mother of the living.
Therefore Irenaeus says that Mary is causa salutis, as antitype
of Eve who was causa mortis.
According to Irenaeus, in the economy of salvation Mary’s function as
second Eve is not limited to a merely negative and physiological
cooperation as Virgin and Mother. Her cooperation involves activities of
the moral order. Her obedience to the word of God was conscious and
free. Moreover, her consent had a soteriological character, because she
knew that the Incarnation of the Son of God was in view of the
redemption of mankind.
In
the other two passages we have quoted, Irenaeus applies to Mary the
title of advocate. It is the first time in the history of ancient
Christian literature that this word is attributed to the Blessed Virgin
(29).
In
what sense can Mary be termed Eve’s advocate? Here, Mary did the
opposite of what Eve did; and in that way she removed the lamentable
effects of Eve’s disobedience. So Eve will not be condemned anymore as
responsible for the ruin of humankind, because this ruin was removed by
means of Mary’s obedience. In conclusion we might affirm that the
current doctrine of Mary’s universal mediation and cooperation in
redemption has its most ancient roots in the teaching of the Bishop of
Lyons. Many years ago J.M. Bover had already seen in St. Irenaeus a
clear defender of the doctrine on Marian mediation (30), and more
recently other scholars have come to the same conclusion (31). Evidently
modern terminology (mediatio, mediatrix, coredemptio, co-redemptrix)
was not known by Irenaeus; but their content, that is the true doctrine
on Marian mediation and collaboration in the salvific economy, seems to
have been clearly taught by the Bishop of Lyons.
Irenaeus of Lyons considered the Virgin Mary not only as the subject of
a dogmatic formula, but as a person with a specific identity. She is the
woman who has to counterbalance Eve, and repair the damages caused by
the latter. Theological reflection on the Virgin Mary brought to light
some questions regarding her person. Questions were raised about Mary’s
perpetual virginity, and the reality of her perpetual virginity was
quickly affirmed by the Fathers, with the exception of Tertullian. The
belief in this truth was transmitted through different traditions:
liturgical, dogmatic, apologetic, and also apocryphal. In any case, all
these traditions agreed in their purpose of defending Mary’s perpetual
virginity. People denying this truth became more and more rare in the
Church, and by the time of Origen (+c.253), only heretics refused to
accept Mary’s perpetual virginity. A few authors, following the
Protoevangelium of James, identified the "brothers of the Lord" with
children born of a former marriage of Joseph. Others gave more credit to
the explanation of Hegesippus, a Christian author of the second century,
whose fragments are quoted by Eusebius of Caesarea, and whose
explanation seems to be closer to Palestinian traditions. Hegesippus
said that the brothers of the Lord must be identified with his cousins.
If the virginitas ante partum and in partu could directly
affect the person of Jesus, the virginitas post partum seemed
more directly related to the person of Mary, to her glorification and to
the desire of the faithful, who liked to look at Mary as a perfect
pattern of virginal life.
In
the third century, and especially in the fourth, several elements
testify that Mary was indeed the object of devotion in earlier times.
One of these elements would be the famous prayer, Sub Tuum Praesidium.
This prayer, known for many centuries in a Latin version, was originally
believed to belong to the Middle Ages; but in 1917 the original Greek
text, probably of the third century, was discovered in a papyrus
acquired by the John Rylands Library of Manchester. Many are the
documents testifying that the Mother of God was already venerated in
previous centuries, such as the numerous accounts of the virgin birth,
the symbols and pictures found in the Roman catacombs, and the homilies
of the Fathers of the Church. All these elements cannot be interpreted
as a sudden phenomenon. Certainly they presume a preceding tradition.
Reflecting on the personal and special relationship between Mary and her
Son, ecclesial tradition also became aware of her special association
with God’s salvific economy. On this particular point the writings of
Justin and Irenaeus opened a long tradition lasting up to our day. The
Fathers of the Church usually came to this conclusion by considering
three facts. First, Mary’s personal relationship with the Redeemer
required a partnership with him in his work, as Eve was Adam’s partner
in sin. Secondly, the Adam-Christ parallelism led to the opposing of Eve
with another woman whose attitude and behavior would neutralize Eve’s
attitude and behavior, the cause of our sin. Thirdly, the Fathers saw
Jesus’ virgin birth as the type of our new birth in Christ
through the sacrament of Baptism. Hence, Mary was not a mere passive
instrument for the Incarnation. The active and responsible aspect of
Mary’s cooperation in the redemptive work of Jesus, which was intuited
by Justin and Tertullian, was clarified and deepened by Irenaeus, whose
doctrine exerted a tremendous influence on future generations.
In
the famous Alexandrian school of theology, the great Origen is renowned,
even for his Marian thought. He shared in the New Testament teaching on
the Virgin Mary as Mother of God and ever-Virgin. But he formulated a
curious theory about Mary’s holiness. He understood Christian sanctity
as a continual journey that makes progress toward higher forms of the
spiritual life. According to this dynamic concept of Christian
perfection, he thought that Mary could not have been totally holy from
the beginning of her life; she also had to make progress in holiness.
For this reason Origen incorrectly posited that Mary had some defects
and imperfections; for instance, she suffered doubt and scandal on
Calvary (32). However, the great thinker of the Alexandrian school did
not avoid exalting Mary’s sanctity and virtues.
(to be
continued)
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
DIVINE MERCY
|
On Humility, Humiliation
The
depth of Jesus' Meekness and Humility
Jesus gave me to know the depth of
His meekness and humility and to understand that He clearly demanded the
same of me (Diary, 758).
The Lord, so very great though He is, delights in humble souls. The more
a soul humbles itself, the greater the kindness with which the Lord
approaches it (Diary, 1092).
RETURN TO TOP |
|
CATHOLIC TEACHING/CONVICTION/TESTIMONY |
CONGREGATION FOR
THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH
INSTRUCTION DIGNITAS PERSONAE
ON CERTAIN BIOETHICAL QUESTIONS
(continued)
Second Part:
New Problems Concerning
Procreation
11. In light of the principles recalled
above, certain questions regarding
procreation which have emerged and have
become more clear in the years since the
publication of
Donum vitae can now be examined.
Techniques for assisting fertility
12. With regard to the treatment of
infertility, new medical techniques must
respect three fundamental goods: a) the
right to life and to physical integrity of
every human being from conception to natural
death; b) the unity of marriage, which means
reciprocal respect for the right within
marriage to become a father or mother only
together with the other spouse;[19]
c) the specifically human values of
sexuality which require “that the
procreation of a human person be brought
about as the fruit of the conjugal act
specific to the love between spouses”.[20]
Techniques which assist procreation “are not
to be rejected on the grounds that they are
artificial. As such, they bear witness to
the possibilities of the art of medicine.
But they must be given a moral evaluation in
reference to the dignity of the human
person, who is called to realize his
vocation from God to the gift of love and
the gift of life”.[21]
In light of this principle, all
techniques of heterologous artificial
fertilization,[22]
as well as those techniques of homologous
artificial fertilization[23]
which substitute for the conjugal act, are
to be excluded. On the other hand,
techniques which act as an aid to the
conjugal act and its fertility are
permitted. The Instruction
Donum vitae states: “The doctor is
at the service of persons and of human
procreation. He does not have the authority
to dispose of them or to decide their
fate. A medical intervention respects the
dignity of persons when it seeks to assist
the conjugal act either in order to
facilitate its performance or in order to
enable it to achieve its objective once it
has been normally performed”.[24]
And, with regard to homologous artificial
insemination, it states: “Homologous
artificial insemination within marriage
cannot be admitted except for those cases in
which the technical means is not a
substitute for the conjugal act, but serves
to facilitate and to help so that the act
attains its natural purpose”.[25]
13. Certainly, techniques aimed at
removing obstacles to natural fertilization,
as for example, hormonal treatments for
infertility, surgery for endometriosis,
unblocking of fallopian tubes or their
surgical repair, are licit. All these
techniques may be considered authentic
treatments because, once the problem
causing the infertility has been resolved,
the married couple is able to engage in
conjugal acts resulting in procreation,
without the physician’s action directly
interfering in that act itself. None of
these treatments replaces the conjugal act,
which alone is worthy of truly responsible
procreation.
In order to come to the aid of the many
infertile couples who want to have children,
adoption should be encouraged,
promoted and facilitated by appropriate
legislation so that the many children who
lack parents may receive a home that will
contribute to their human development. In
addition, research and investment directed
at the prevention of sterility
deserve encouragement.
(to be continued)
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
Monthly Index
General Archive
2008
General Archive
2007
General Archive
2006
General Archive 2005
General Archive 2004 |
|
|
|

Hits since 3/16/2004
Màn điện
toán toàn cầu của Thiếu Nhi Fatima được bắt đầu với trang Main từ ngày
9/12/1999,
nhưng
mãi tới Mùa Hè 2001 mới tạm xong,
cuối
cùng đã được chỉnh trang về cả hình thức lẫn nội dung từ mùa hè năm
2002,
để rồi
chính thức tái ra mắt vào ngày 25/3/2003 cho đến nay.
TNFatima.org
do
Thiếu Nhi Fatima
chủ trương và thực hiện
Mọi ý kiến
đóng góp xin gửi về
Webmaster
|

|
|
|
|