| |
| |

|
TRÁI TIM
MẸ: NƠI CON NƯƠNG NÁU - ĐƯỜNG ĐẾN VỚI CHÚA |
|
"Chúa Giêsu muốn dùng con để làm
cho Mẹ được nhận biết và yêu mến" |
|
December 28, 2008
–
Sunday in
Christmas Octave - Holy Family
DAILY LITURGICAL/THEME MEDITATION:
"This child is set for the fall and
rising of many"
UNIVERSAL CHURCH/WORLD EVENT(S):
Jerusalem patriarch
laments situation in Holy Land, Iraq
SAINT OF THE DAY
Feast of the Holy
Innocents
GENERAL
MARIOLOGY
Mary and the Fathers of the Church
The Christian Apologists
DIVINE MERCY
On Humility, Humiliation
God Defends The Humble Soul
TEACHING/TESTIMONY/CONVICTION:
INSTRUCTION
DIGNITAS PERSONAE
ON CERTAIN BIOETHICAL
QUESTIONS
First Part:
Anthropological,
Theological and Ethical Aspects of
Human Life and Procreation
Monthly Index

|
|
DAILY LITURGICAL MEDITATION |
|
Sunday (12/28): "This child is set for the
fall and rising of many"
Scripture: Luke 2:22-35
22 And when the time came for their purification according to the
law of Moses, they brought him up to Jerusalem to present him to the
Lord 23 (as it is written in the law of the Lord, "Every male that
opens the womb shall be called holy to the Lord") 24 and to offer a
sacrifice according to what is said in the law of the Lord, "a pair
of turtledoves, or two young pigeons."
25 Now there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon, and
this man was righteous and devout, looking for the consolation of
Israel, and the Holy Spirit was upon him. 26 And it had been
revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he should not see death
before he had seen the Lord's Christ. 27 And inspired by the Spirit
he came into the temple; and when the parents brought in the child
Jesus, to do for him according to the custom of the law, 28 he took
him up in his arms and blessed God and said, 29 "Lord, now lettest
thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word; 30 for mine
eyes have seen thy salvation 31 which thou hast prepared in the
presence of all peoples, 32 a light for revelation to the Gentiles,
and for glory to thy people Israel." 33 And his father and his
mother marveled at what was said about him; 34 and Simeon blessed
them and said to Mary his mother, "Behold, this child is set for the
fall and rising of many in Israel, and for a sign that is spoken
against 35 (and a sword will pierce through your own soul also),
that thoughts out of many hearts may be revealed."
36 And there was a prophetess, Anna, the daughter of Phan'u-el,
of the tribe of Asher; she was of a great age, having lived with her
husband seven years from her virginity, 37 and as a widow till she
was eighty-four. She did not depart from the temple, worshiping with
fasting and prayer night and day. 38 And coming up at that very hour
she gave thanks to God, and spoke of him to all who were looking for
the redemption of Jerusalem. 39 And when they had performed
everything according to the law of the Lord, they returned into
Galilee, to their own city, Nazareth. 40 And the child grew and
became strong, filled with wisdom; and the favor of God was upon
him.
Meditation: Is your life in tune with the Holy Spirit? Simeon was
a man who was just towards others and devout towards God. He gladly
accepted the mission God called him to perform with much fervent prayer
and with patient expectation. His whole life was in tune with the Holy
Spirit. His was found daily in the temple in prayer and worship and in
humble and faithful expectation for the day that the Lord would comfort
his people. As the days and months grew into years he never lost hope.
When Joseph and Mary presented the child Jesus in the temple, Simeon
immediately recognized the Lord’s presence in his temple. Through eyes
of faith he say the infant Jesus as the fulfillment of all the messianic
prophecies, hopes, and prayers of the people of Israel. Inspired by the
Holy Spirit he prophesied that Jesus was to be "a revealing light to the
Gentiles". Jesus came not only as “light and salvation” for the people
of Israel, but for all nations as well.
Jesus is the new temple (John 1:14; 2:19-22). In the Old Testament
God manifested his presence in the “pillar of cloud” by day and the
“pillar of fire” by night as he led them through the wilderness. God’s
glory visibly came to dwell over the ark and the tabernacle (Exodus
40:34-38). When the first temple was build in Jerusalem God’s glory came
to rest there (1 Kings 8). After the first temple was destroyed, Ezekiel
saw God’s glory leave it (Ezekiel 10). But God promised one day to fill
it with even greater glory (Haggai 2:1-9; Zechariah 8-9). That promise
is fulfilled when the “King of Glory” himself comes to his temple (Psalm
24:7-10; Malachi 3:1). Through Jesus’coming in the flesh and through
his saving death, resurrection, and ascension we are made living temples
of his Holy Spirit (1 Cor. 3:16-17). Do you recognize that you are God’s
temple and that his Spirit dwells within you?
Simeon blessed Mary and Joseph and he prophesied to Mary about the
destiny of this child and the suffering she would undergo for his sake.
There is a certain paradox for those blessed by the Lord. Mary was given
the blessedness of being the mother of the Son of God. That blessedness
also would become a sword which pierced her heart as her Son died upon
the cross. She received both a crown of joy and a cross of sorrow. But
her joy was not diminished by her sorrow because it was fueled by her
faith, hope, and trust in God and his promises. Jesus promised his
disciples that "no one will take your joy from you" (John 16:22). The
Lord gives us a supernatural joy which enables us to bear any sorrow or
pain and which neither life nor death can take way. Do you know the joy
of a life fully surrendered to God with faith and trust?
"Lord Jesus, may I recognize your visitation and be prepared for your
action today, just as Simeon Anna were prepared and ready to respond to
your visitation and action in their day."
Psalm 96:1-6
1 O sing to the LORD a new song; sing to the LORD, all the earth.
2 Sing to the LORD, bless his name; tell of his salvation from day to
day.
3 Declare his glory among the nations, his marvelous works among all the
peoples.
4 For great is the LORD, and greatly to be praised; he is to be revered
above all gods.
5 For all the gods of the peoples are idols, but the LORD made the
heavens.
6 Honor and majesty are before him; strength and beauty are in his
sanctuary.
RETURN
TO TOP
|
|
UNIVERSAL CHURCH/WORLD EVENTS |
Jerusalem patriarch
laments situation in
Holy Land, Iraq
His Beatitude Fouad Twal
yesterday issued his
first Christmas message
as Latin Patriarch of
Jerusalem. The former
Archbishop of Tunis was
named Coadjutor
Archbishop of Jerusalem
in 2005 and became Latin
Patriarch on June 21.
Recent hopeful signs,
the archbishop noted, do
“not prevent us from
being saddened on a
daily basis by the
instability, insecurity,
the unclear vision for
the future, and, not
least, the aggression
against citizens and
their land and property
… We do not forget what
divides us: greed mixed
with injustice, violence
and man’s persecution of
his fellow man. All
these beset the Holy
City, not mentioning the
building of settlements
which strangle it. In
consequence the
Jerusalem Churches
suffer from the on-going
emigration of the
Christians, due to the
lack of peace and the
deterioration of the
political situation. All
this makes us anxious
for the future of the
Christian community, in
the Homeland of Christ.”
“With pain and deep
sadness,” the patriarch
continued, “we observe
civilians being
blockaded by the
erection of walls and
barriers. These
contribute to the
creation of violence and
humiliation, generating
grudges and hatred.” The
patriarch also lamented
“the unjust siege that
has struck Gaza, and the
hundreds of thousands of
innocent residents
there.”
After discussing the
situation of Holy Land
Christians, Patriarch
Twal turned his
attention to Iraq. “The
second tragedy, about
which our conscience
permits us neither to
ignore nor to keep
silent, is that of Iraq,
whose population,
culture, heritage and
history have been
undermined because of
its occupation by
foreign military forces.
This has brought about
the destruction of its
fundamental structures,
transforming it into a
jungle of chaos,
violence, and terrorism.
It is our wish that all
Iraqi citizens should be
able to remain in their
homeland. We pray for
the unity of Iraq and
for its return to normal
life.”
RETURN
TO TOP
|
|
DAILY LITURGICAL SAINT |
|
December 28, 2008

Feast of the Holy Innocents
Herod
“the Great,” king of Judea, was unpopular with his people because of his
connections with the Romans and his religious indifference. Hence he was
insecure and fearful of any threat to his throne. He was a master
politician and a tyrant capable of extreme brutality. He killed his
wife, his brother and his sister’s two husbands, to name only a few.
Matthew 2:1-18 tells this story: Herod was “greatly troubled” when
astrologers from the east came asking the whereabouts of “the newborn
king of the Jews,” whose star they had seen. They were told that the
Jewish Scriptures named Bethlehem as the place where the Messiah would
be born. Herod cunningly told them to report back to him so that he
could also “do him homage.” They found Jesus, offered him their gifts
and, warned by an angel, avoided Herod on their way home. Jesus escaped
to Egypt.
Herod became furious and “ordered the massacre of all the boys in
Bethlehem and its vicinity two years old and under.” The horror of the
massacre and the devastation of the mothers and fathers led Matthew to
quote Jeremiah: “A voice was heard in Ramah,/sobbing and loud
lamentation;/Rachel weeping for her children...” (Matthew 2:18). Rachel
was the wife of Jacob/Israel. She is pictured as weeping at the place
where the Israelites were herded together by the conquering Assyrians
for their march into captivity.
Comment:
Twenty babies are few, in comparison to the genocide and abortion of our
day. But even if there had been only one, we recognize the greatest
treasure God put on the earth—a human person, destined for eternity and
graced by Jesus’ death and resurrection.
Quote:
"Lord, you give us life even before we understand" (Prayer Over the
Gifts, Feast of the Holy Innocents).
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
GENERAL
MARIOLOGY |
Mary and the
Fathers of the Church
By
Fr. Luigi Gambero, S.M.
The
following article is an excerpt from the recently published Marian
anthology, Mariology: A Guide
for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons, Seat of
Wisdom Books, A Division of Queenship, 2008. Fifteen international
Mariology experts contributed to the text. The book features a foreword
by Archbishop Raymond L. Burke and has 17 chapters divided into four
parts: 1. Mary in Scripture and the Early Church; 2. Marian Dogma; 3.
Marian Doctrine; and 4. Marian Liturgy and Devotion. The book is now
available from Queenship Publications. To obtain a copy, visit
queenship.org.
Visit
books.google.com and search on "Mariology: A Guide" to view the book
in its entirety, or simply
click here.
Asst. Ed.
The Christian Apologists
The
Christian Apologists lived in the second century and their writings were
a defense of Christian faith against the charges made by Jews and
pagans. They were the first Christian writers able to establish a
contact with the world outside the Church. We have a long list of names:
Quadratus, Aristides of Athens, Aristo of Pella, Tatian the Syrian,
Miltiades, Apollinaris of Hierapolis, Athenagoras of Athens, Theophilus
of Antioch, Hermias, the author of the Epistle to Diognetus, Melito of
Sardes and Justin.
As
far as Mary is concerned, we are especially interested in St. Justin
the Martyr (+c.165), whose Marian doctrine must be understood in his
theological context, as it appears from his extant works, namely two
Apologies and a Dialogue with the Jew Trypho. He develops an
extensive theory on the divine Logos, the Son of God, through whom the
Father created all things and governs the world. Because of the ruse and
the trick of Satan, in whom Adam and Eve put their faith and trust,
human beings fell into sin and were subjected to the demons, to
sufferings and to death. God conceived a salvific plan (oikonomia)
and entrusted its achievement to his Son, who became incarnate, suffered
and died in order to bring us a remedy. The Logos accepted the will of
the Father not because the oikonomia was unavoidable, but for our
sake.
Among
the details of this economy, Justin pays special attention to the
mystery of Jesus’ birth from the Virgin, because through all that Mary
did for him as a mother we understand that the Son of God really became
the son of man. God, though having many ways to carry out the
Incarnation of his divine Logos, had a special reason for performing the
miracle of the virgin birth. Justin gives a deep explanation: as Eve,
the first virgin, accepted and conceived the word of Satan and gave
birth to disobedience and death, in the same way another virgin,
believing in the Word of God, through her obedience gave birth to the
Son of God, who is himself Life.
Thus
we have two women, both virgin and mother. At the beginning of the
world’s history, Eve is the symbol and the cause of a ruinous economy
for all humanity. In opposition to her, God wanted another virgin, one
who opens the new economy of redemption and salvation for all human
creatures (18).
Virginity and maternity are the two evangelical and traditional
statements on Mary, which Justin also stresses, yet in Christological
contexts. These two prerogatives go together in the writings of Justin,
because he understands very well that God’s economy required a virgin
mother for the Incarnation of his Son.
Mary
truly gave birth to Jesus, as every human mother gives birth to her
children. We should not wonder if Justin does not attribute to Mary the
title of mother and still less of Mother of God. The reasons are: first
of all he always speaks about Christ and not initially about Mary, who
enters the discourse only because of her function regarding the
incarnate Word. Secondly the title of Mother of God will become current
much later, especially at the time of the Nestorian heresy. Before that
time, we do not have many witnesses for the use of this title. However,
in the writings of Justin, the objective content of divine maternity is
fully expressed. In fact, he insistently affirms that the Son of the
unbegotten and invisible God and Creator, eternally begotten by him, but
distinct from him, the Word by whom all things were made and left in
them his own mark (19), who appeared and spoke with the patriarchs and
prophets, according to the will of his Father, came down into the world
and became man of the Virgin Mary, taking a true human flesh.
Justin plainly affirms that the incarnate Son of God is one in being,
one in substance, one in person. To this one being we refer all his
words and all his deeds, both the human and the divine. Therefore we may
presume that Justin thought that Mary was really the Mother of God,
having conceived, carried in her womb and given birth to the eternal
Word of God.
The
difficult question could be raised: What was the real contribution which
Mary, as Mother, gave to the conception of the Son of God? Did Justin
consider Mary’s body the material cause of Christ’s humanity, namely its
carnal root? He denies that the body of Christ was formed by male seed.
He very seldom uses the preposition ek (from), whereas he very
often states that the Son of God was born dia (through or by
means) of the Virgin Mary. We can understand this terminology if we do
not forget that Justin is something of a philosopher. He does not employ
the expression: dia tes Parthenou (through the Virgin) to
diminish or to depreciate Mary’s maternal activity in the conception of
Christ, but only because this was the teaching of the biology of that
time, according to which a woman was completely passive in the
conception of babies. The only active principle was the man’s seed (Cf.
1 Cor 11:8 and 12).
Of
course, in the conception of Christ, male seed was excluded; in fact,
Justin speaks of a virginal conception in which the body of the
incarnate Word was the result of the intervention of God’s almightiness
which replaced man’s seed. But leaving aside the biological theory of
that time, Justin seems very aware of the perfect maternal role played
by Mary in the Incarnation. Like every other mother, Mary conceived; but
she also carried in her womb and gave birth to the Son of God. Thus, she
is indeed the Mother of the Son of God.
We
already said that the virginal motherhood of Mary is firmly defended by
Justin; it should be added that it is his main statement on Mary. In
fact he was able to understand that virginal maternity was the condition
which allowed Mary to enter the divine plan of salvation in a unique
way. Differently from any other mother, she is the Virgin-Mother; Mother
and Virgin at the same time. Justin had to face pagans and Jews. Pagans
did not believe in the miracle of a Virgin-Mother; Jews were scandalized
that one could state that God has a mother. Our apologist understands
that no human proof is able to demonstrate such a miracle. Therefore, he
feels compelled to have recourse to the prophecies of the Old Testament.
He rightly identifies Mary with the virgin foretold by the prophet
Isaiah (7:14). For him, Mary is the virgin par excellence, so
that several times in his writings she is simply called: "the Virgin,"
without her name; saying "Mary" and saying "the Virgin" is the same
thing. We ought not ask Justin whether he believed in the virginity
ante-, in- and post-partum. This was not his problem,
even though we may guess that his answer on this point would certainly
be affirmative.
Between Ignatius of Antioch and Justin we have only a half-century of
history, and we can notice how much the image of Mary has gained clearer
and more detailed features. We are not yet dealing with a real Marian
theology; but we notice that Justin feels the need to pay greater
attention to the person of the Mother of Jesus in order to make more
understandable the mystery of her divine Son.
Especially in the conception of the oikonomia, the teaching of
our apologist represents a remarkable progress. In this economy, the
Virgin Mary is shown in so active a role that our mind immediately goes
to the concept of mediation (20).
However, the significance of the Marian texts of St. Justin can be
compared with the texts of St. Ignatius. Justin was not a bishop like
Ignatius, and therefore he was not a qualified witness and preacher of
Divine Revelation. He was only a layman, a philosopher, who passionately
cultivated Christian truth as it was transmitted by the Tradition of the
Church. He is the first author who describes with remarkable extent the
figure and the mission of Mary. For the first time, the traditional data
are elaborated, developed and compared one with another, though we must
not forget that Justin, in elaborating his teaching, is guided by
apologetic and polemic criteria and not by theological principles. The
importance of Justin is still greater if we consider that he knew
perfectly the sources of Revelation, both the Old and the New Testament,
and he had a considerable respect for them. For instance, he avoids
taking away or adding anything to the Holy Scriptures. He searches in
the Old Testament for a confirmation of the New; but he also interprets
the Old Testament in the light arising from the New and especially from
the divine person of the incarnate Word of God.
Moreover, the teaching of Justin can be referred to the entire Church of
his time, because as a wandering philosopher he knew both Eastern and
Western Christianity. For this reason his teaching about the Virgin Mary
appears more universal than St. Ignatius’ and testifies that on the
Mother of the Lord the unanimity of both the Eastern and Western
churches is very ancient. Therefore we also understand why the teaching
of the Fathers of the Church can offer a base for today’s ecumenical
dialogue.
(to be
continued)
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
DIVINE MERCY
|
On Humility, Humiliation
God
Defends The Humble Soul
A humble soul does not trust itself,
but places all its confidence in God. (Diary, 593).
God defends the humble soul and lets Himself into its secrets, and the
soul abides in unsurpassable happiness which no one can comprehend (Diary,
593).
RETURN TO TOP |
|
CATHOLIC TEACHING/CONVICTION/TESTIMONY |
CONGREGATION FOR
THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH
INSTRUCTION DIGNITAS PERSONAE
ON CERTAIN BIOETHICAL QUESTIONS
(continued)
First Part:
Anthropological, Theological and Ethical
Aspects of
Human Life and Procreation
4. In recent decades, medical science
has made significant strides in
understanding human life in its initial
stages. Human biological structures and the
process of human generation are better
known. These developments are certainly
positive and worthy of support when they
serve to overcome or correct pathologies and
succeed in re-establishing the normal
functioning of human procreation. On the
other hand, they are negative and cannot be
utilized when they involve the destruction
of human beings or when they employ means
which contradict the dignity of the person
or when they are used for purposes contrary
to the integral good of man.
The body of a human being, from the very
first stages of its existence, can never be
reduced merely to a group of cells. The
embryonic human body develops progressively
according to a well-defined program with its
proper finality, as is apparent in the birth
of every baby.
It is appropriate to recall the
fundamental ethical criterion expressed
in the Instruction
Donum vitae in order to evaluate all
moral questions which relate to procedures
involving the human embryo: “Thus the fruit
of human generation, from the first moment
of its existence, that is to say, from the
moment the zygote has formed, demands the
unconditional respect that is morally due to
the human being in his bodily and spiritual
totality. The human being is to be respected
and treated as a person from the moment of
conception; and therefore from that same
moment his rights as a person must be
recognized, among which in the first place
is the inviolable right of every innocent
human being to life”.[6]
5. This ethical principle, which reason
is capable of recognizing as true and in
conformity with the natural moral law,
should be the basis for all legislation in
this area.[7] In
fact, it presupposes a truth of an
ontological character, as
Donum vitae demonstrated from solid
scientific evidence, regarding the
continuity in development of a human being.
If
Donum vitae, in order to avoid a
statement of an explicitly philosophical
nature, did not define the embryo as a
person, it nonetheless did indicate that
there is an intrinsic connection between the
ontological dimension and the specific value
of every human life. Although the presence
of the spiritual soul cannot be observed
experimentally, the conclusions of science
regarding the human embryo give “a valuable
indication for discerning by the use of
reason a personal presence at the moment of
the first appearance of a human life: how
could a human individual not be a human
person?”.[8]
Indeed, the reality of the human being for
the entire span of life, both before and
after birth, does not allow us to posit
either a change in nature or a gradation in
moral value, since it possesses full
anthropological and ethical status. The
human embryo has, therefore, from the very
beginning, the dignity proper to a person.
6. Respect for that dignity is owed to
every human being because each one carries
in an indelible way his own dignity and
value. The origin of human life has its
authentic context in marriage and in the
family, where it is generated through an
act which expresses the reciprocal love
between a man and a woman. Procreation which
is truly responsible vis-à-vis the child to
be born “must be the fruit of marriage”.[9]
Marriage, present in all times and in all
cultures, “is in reality something wisely
and providently instituted by God the
Creator with a view to carrying out his
loving plan in human beings. Thus, husband
and wife, through the reciprocal gift of
themselves to the other – something which is
proper and exclusive to them – bring about
that communion of persons by which they
perfect each other, so as to cooperate with
God in the procreation and raising of new
lives”.[10]
In the fruitfulness of married love, man and
woman “make it clear that at the origin of
their spousal life there is a genuine ‘yes’,
which is pronounced and truly lived in
reciprocity, remaining ever open to life...
Natural law, which is at the root of the
recognition of true equality between persons
and peoples, deserves to be recognized as
the source that inspires the relationship
between the spouses in their responsibility
for begetting new children. The transmission
of life is inscribed in nature and its laws
stand as an unwritten norm to which all must
refer”.[11]
7. It is the Church’s conviction that
what is human is not only received and
respected by faith, but is also
purified, elevated and perfected. God, after
having created man in his image and likeness
(cf. Gen 1:26), described his
creature as “very good” (Gen 1:31),
so as to be assumed later in the Son (cf.
Jn 1:14). In the mystery of the
Incarnation, the Son of God confirmed the
dignity of the body and soul which
constitute the human being. Christ did not
disdain human bodiliness, but instead fully
disclosed its meaning and value: “In
reality, it is only in the mystery of the
incarnate Word that the mystery of man truly
becomes clear”.[12]
By becoming one of us, the Son makes it
possible for us to become “sons of God” (Jn
1:12), “sharers in the divine nature” (2
Pet 1:4). This new dimension does not
conflict with the dignity of the creature
which everyone can recognize by the use of
reason, but elevates it into a wider horizon
of life which is proper to God, giving us
the ability to reflect more profoundly on
human life and on the acts by which it is
brought into existence.[13]
The respect for the individual human
being, which reason requires, is further
enhanced and strengthened in the light of
these truths of faith: thus, we see that
there is no contradiction between the
affirmation of the dignity and the
affirmation of the sacredness of human life.
“The different ways in which God, acting in
history, cares for the world and for mankind
are not mutually exclusive; on the contrary,
they support each other and intersect. They
have their origin and goal in the eternal,
wise and loving counsel whereby God
predestines men and women ‘to be conformed
to the image of his Son’ (Rom 8:29)”.[14]
8. By taking the interrelationship of
these two dimensions, the human and the
divine, as the starting point, one
understands better why it is that man has
unassailable value: he possesses an
eternal vocation and is called to
share in the trinitarian love of the living
God.
This value belongs to all without
distinction. By virtue of the simple fact of
existing, every human being must be fully
respected. The introduction of
discrimination with regard to human dignity
based on biological, psychological, or
educational development, or based on
health-related criteria, must be
excluded. At every stage of his existence,
man, created in the image and likeness of
God, reflects “the face of his Only-begotten
Son… This boundless and almost
incomprehensible love of God for the human
being reveals the degree to which the human
person deserves to be loved in himself,
independently of any other consideration –
intelligence, beauty, health, youth,
integrity, and so forth. In short, human
life is always a good, for it ‘is a
manifestation of God in the world, a sign of
his presence, a trace of his glory’ (Evangelium
vitae, 34)”.[15]
9. These two dimensions of life, the
natural and the supernatural, allow us to
understand better the sense in which the
acts that permit a new human being to come
into existence, in which a man and a
woman give themselves to each other, are
a reflection of trinitarian love. “God,
who is love and life, has inscribed in man
and woman the vocation to share in a special
way in his mystery of personal communion and
in his work as Creator and Father”.[16]
Christian marriage is rooted “in the
natural complementarity that exists between
man and woman, and is nurtured through the
personal willingness of the spouses to share
their entire life-project, what they have
and what they are: for this reason such
communion is the fruit and the sign of a
profoundly human need. But in Christ the
Lord, God takes up this human need, confirms
it, purifies it and elevates it, leading it
to perfection through the sacrament of
matrimony: the Holy Spirit who is poured out
in the sacramental celebration offers
Christian couples the gift of a new
communion of love that is the living and
real image of that unique unity which makes
of the Church the indivisible Mystical Body
of the Lord Jesus”.[17]
10. The Church, by expressing an ethical
judgment on some developments of recent
medical research concerning man and his
beginnings, does not intervene in the area
proper to medical science itself, but rather
calls everyone to ethical and social
responsibility for their actions. She
reminds them that the ethical value of
biomedical science is gauged in reference to
both the unconditional respect owed to
every human being at every moment of his
or her existence, and the defense of the
specific character of the personal act which
transmits life. The intervention of the
Magisterium falls within its mission of
contributing to the formation of conscience,
by authentically teaching the truth which is
Christ and at the same time by declaring and
confirming authoritatively the principles of
the moral order which spring from human
nature itself.[18]
(to be continued)
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
Monthly Index
General Archive
2008
General Archive
2007
General Archive
2006
General Archive 2005
General Archive 2004 |
|
|
|

Hits since 3/16/2004
Màn điện
toán toàn cầu của Thiếu Nhi Fatima được bắt đầu với trang Main từ ngày
9/12/1999,
nhưng
mãi tới Mùa Hè 2001 mới tạm xong,
cuối
cùng đã được chỉnh trang về cả hình thức lẫn nội dung từ mùa hè năm
2002,
để rồi
chính thức tái ra mắt vào ngày 25/3/2003 cho đến nay.
TNFatima.org
do
Thiếu Nhi Fatima
chủ trương và thực hiện
Mọi ý kiến
đóng góp xin gửi về
Webmaster
|

|
|
|
|