TRÁI TIM MẸ:  NƠI CON NƯƠNG NÁU - ĐƯỜNG ĐẾN VỚI CHÚA

"Chúa Giêsu muốn dùng con để làm cho Mẹ được nhận biết và yêu mến"

 

 

    December 28, 2008  Sunday in Christmas Octave - Holy Family 

 

DAILY LITURGICAL/THEME MEDITATION:

"This child is set for the fall and rising of many"

UNIVERSAL CHURCH/WORLD EVENT(S):

Jerusalem patriarch laments situation in Holy Land, Iraq

SAINT OF THE DAY

Feast of the Holy Innocents

 GENERAL MARIOLOGY
Mary and the Fathers of the Church

The Christian Apologists

DIVINE MERCY

On Humility, Humiliation

God Defends The Humble Soul

 TEACHING/TESTIMONY/CONVICTION:

INSTRUCTION DIGNITAS PERSONAE

ON CERTAIN BIOETHICAL QUESTIONS

First Part:

Anthropological, Theological and Ethical Aspects of
Human Life and Procreation

 

Monthly Index

 

 

DAILY LITURGICAL MEDITATION

 
Sunday (12/28): "This child is set for the fall and rising of many"

Scripture: Luke 2:22-35

22 And when the time came for their purification according to the law of Moses, they brought him up to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord 23 (as it is written in the law of the Lord, "Every male that opens the womb shall be called holy to the Lord") 24 and to offer a sacrifice according to what is said in the law of the Lord, "a pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons."

25 Now there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon, and this man was righteous and devout, looking for the consolation of Israel, and the Holy Spirit was upon him. 26 And it had been revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he should not see death before he had seen the Lord's Christ. 27 And inspired by the Spirit he came into the temple; and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him according to the custom of the law, 28 he took him up in his arms and blessed God and said, 29 "Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word; 30 for mine eyes have seen thy salvation 31 which thou hast prepared in the presence of all peoples, 32 a light for revelation to the Gentiles, and for glory to thy people Israel." 33 And his father and his mother marveled at what was said about him; 34 and Simeon blessed them and said to Mary his mother, "Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising of many in  Israel, and for a sign that is spoken against 35 (and a sword will pierce through your own soul also), that thoughts out of many hearts may be revealed."

36 And there was a prophetess, Anna, the daughter of Phan'u-el, of the tribe of Asher; she was of a great age, having lived with her husband seven years from her virginity, 37 and as a widow till she was eighty-four. She did not depart from the temple, worshiping with fasting and prayer night and day. 38 And coming up at that very hour she gave thanks to God, and spoke of him to all who were looking for the redemption of Jerusalem. 39 And when they had performed everything according to the law of the Lord, they returned into Galilee, to their own city, Nazareth. 40 And the child grew and became strong, filled with wisdom; and the favor of God was upon him.

Meditation: Is your life in tune with the Holy Spirit? Simeon was a man who was just towards others and devout towards God. He gladly accepted the mission God called him to perform with much fervent prayer and with patient expectation. His whole life was in tune with the Holy Spirit.  His was found daily in the temple in prayer and worship and in humble and faithful expectation for the day that the Lord would comfort his people.  As the days and months grew into years he never lost hope. When  Joseph and Mary presented the child Jesus in the temple, Simeon immediately recognized the Lord’s presence in his temple. Through eyes of faith he say the infant Jesus as the fulfillment of all the messianic prophecies, hopes, and prayers of the people of Israel. Inspired by the Holy Spirit he prophesied that Jesus was to be "a revealing light to the Gentiles". Jesus came not only as “light and salvation” for the people of Israel, but for all nations as well.

Jesus is the new temple (John 1:14; 2:19-22). In the Old Testament God manifested his presence in the “pillar of cloud” by day and the “pillar of fire” by night as he led them through the wilderness. God’s glory visibly came to dwell over the ark and the tabernacle (Exodus 40:34-38). When the first temple was build in Jerusalem God’s glory came to rest there (1 Kings 8). After the first temple was destroyed, Ezekiel saw God’s glory leave it (Ezekiel 10). But God promised one day to fill it with even greater glory (Haggai 2:1-9; Zechariah 8-9). That promise is fulfilled when the “King of Glory” himself comes to his temple (Psalm 24:7-10; Malachi 3:1).  Through Jesus’coming in the flesh and through his saving death, resurrection, and ascension we are made living temples of his Holy Spirit (1 Cor. 3:16-17). Do you recognize that you are God’s temple and that his Spirit dwells within you?

Simeon blessed Mary and Joseph and he prophesied to Mary about the destiny of this child and the suffering she would undergo for his sake. There is a certain paradox for those blessed by the Lord. Mary was given the blessedness of being the mother of the Son of God. That blessedness also would become a sword which pierced her heart as her Son died upon the cross. She received both a crown of joy and a cross of sorrow. But her joy was not diminished by her sorrow because it was fueled by her faith, hope, and trust in God and his promises. Jesus promised his disciples that "no one will take your joy from you" (John 16:22). The Lord gives us a supernatural joy which enables us to bear any sorrow or pain and which neither life nor death can take way. Do you know the joy of a life fully surrendered to God with faith and trust?

"Lord Jesus, may I recognize your visitation and be prepared for your action today, just as Simeon Anna were prepared and ready to respond to your visitation and action in their day."

Psalm 96:1-6

1 O sing to the LORD a new song; sing to the LORD, all the earth.
2 Sing to the LORD, bless his name; tell of his salvation from day to day.
3 Declare his glory among the nations, his marvelous works among all the peoples.
4 For great is the LORD, and greatly to be praised; he is to be revered above all gods.
5 For all the gods of the peoples are idols, but the LORD made the heavens.
6 Honor and majesty are before him; strength and beauty are in his sanctuary.
 

RETURN TO TOP
 

UNIVERSAL CHURCH/WORLD EVENTS

 

Jerusalem patriarch laments situation in Holy Land, Iraq

His Beatitude Fouad Twal yesterday issued his first Christmas message as Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem. The former Archbishop of Tunis was named Coadjutor Archbishop of Jerusalem in 2005 and became Latin Patriarch on June 21.

Recent hopeful signs, the archbishop noted, do “not prevent us from being saddened on a daily basis by the instability, insecurity, the unclear vision for the future, and, not least, the aggression against citizens and their land and property … We do not forget what divides us: greed mixed with injustice, violence and man’s persecution of his fellow man. All these beset the Holy City, not mentioning the building of settlements which strangle it. In consequence the Jerusalem Churches suffer from the on-going emigration of the Christians, due to the lack of peace and the deterioration of the political situation. All this makes us anxious for the future of the Christian community, in the Homeland of Christ.”

“With pain and deep sadness,” the patriarch continued, “we observe civilians being blockaded by the erection of walls and barriers. These contribute to the creation of violence and humiliation, generating grudges and hatred.” The patriarch also lamented “the unjust siege that has struck Gaza, and the hundreds of thousands of innocent residents there.”

After discussing the situation of Holy Land Christians, Patriarch Twal turned his attention to Iraq. “The second tragedy, about which our conscience permits us neither to ignore nor to keep silent, is that of Iraq, whose population, culture, heritage and history have been undermined because of its occupation by foreign military forces. This has brought about the destruction of its fundamental structures, transforming it into a jungle of chaos, violence, and terrorism. It is our wish that all Iraqi citizens should be able to remain in their homeland. We pray for the unity of Iraq and for its return to normal life.”

RETURN TO TOP
 

DAILY LITURGICAL SAINT

 

December 28, 2008

Feast of the Holy Innocents

 Herod “the Great,” king of Judea, was unpopular with his people because of his connections with the Romans and his religious indifference. Hence he was insecure and fearful of any threat to his throne. He was a master politician and a tyrant capable of extreme brutality. He killed his wife, his brother and his sister’s two husbands, to name only a few.

Matthew 2:1-18 tells this story: Herod was “greatly troubled” when astrologers from the east came asking the whereabouts of “the newborn king of the Jews,” whose star they had seen. They were told that the Jewish Scriptures named Bethlehem as the place where the Messiah would be born. Herod cunningly told them to report back to him so that he could also “do him homage.” They found Jesus, offered him their gifts and, warned by an angel, avoided Herod on their way home. Jesus escaped to Egypt.

Herod became furious and “ordered the massacre of all the boys in Bethlehem and its vicinity two years old and under.” The horror of the massacre and the devastation of the mothers and fathers led Matthew to quote Jeremiah: “A voice was heard in Ramah,/sobbing and loud lamentation;/Rachel weeping for her children...” (Matthew 2:18). Rachel was the wife of Jacob/Israel. She is pictured as weeping at the place where the Israelites were herded together by the conquering Assyrians for their march into captivity.

Comment:

Twenty babies are few, in comparison to the genocide and abortion of our day. But even if there had been only one, we recognize the greatest treasure God put on the earth—a human person, destined for eternity and graced by Jesus’ death and resurrection.

Quote:

"Lord, you give us life even before we understand" (Prayer Over the Gifts, Feast of the Holy Innocents).
 

RETURN TO TOP
 

GENERAL MARIOLOGY


 

Mary and the Fathers of the Church

 By Fr. Luigi Gambero, S.M.    

The following article is an excerpt from the recently published Marian anthology, Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons, Seat of Wisdom Books, A Division of Queenship, 2008. Fifteen international Mariology experts contributed to the text. The book features a foreword by Archbishop Raymond L. Burke and has 17 chapters divided into four parts: 1. Mary in Scripture and the Early Church; 2. Marian Dogma; 3. Marian Doctrine; and 4. Marian Liturgy and Devotion. The book is now available from Queenship Publications. To obtain a copy, visit queenship.org. Visit books.google.com and search on "Mariology: A Guide" to view the book in its entirety, or simply click here.
Asst. Ed
. 

The Christian Apologists

The Christian Apologists lived in the second century and their writings were a defense of Christian faith against the charges made by Jews and pagans. They were the first Christian writers able to establish a contact with the world outside the Church. We have a long list of names: Quadratus, Aristides of Athens, Aristo of Pella, Tatian the Syrian, Miltiades, Apollinaris of Hierapolis, Athenagoras of Athens, Theophilus of Antioch, Hermias, the author of the Epistle to Diognetus, Melito of Sardes and Justin.

As far as Mary is concerned, we are especially interested in St. Justin the Martyr (+c.165), whose Marian doctrine must be understood in his theological context, as it appears from his extant works, namely two Apologies and a Dialogue with the Jew Trypho. He develops an extensive theory on the divine Logos, the Son of God, through whom the Father created all things and governs the world. Because of the ruse and the trick of Satan, in whom Adam and Eve put their faith and trust, human beings fell into sin and were subjected to the demons, to sufferings and to death. God conceived a salvific plan (oikonomia) and entrusted its achievement to his Son, who became incarnate, suffered and died in order to bring us a remedy. The Logos accepted the will of the Father not because the oikonomia was unavoidable, but for our sake.

Among the details of this economy, Justin pays special attention to the mystery of Jesus’ birth from the Virgin, because through all that Mary did for him as a mother we understand that the Son of God really became the son of man. God, though having many ways to carry out the Incarnation of his divine Logos, had a special reason for performing the miracle of the virgin birth. Justin gives a deep explanation: as Eve, the first virgin, accepted and conceived the word of Satan and gave birth to disobedience and death, in the same way another virgin, believing in the Word of God, through her obedience gave birth to the Son of God, who is himself Life.

Thus we have two women, both virgin and mother. At the beginning of the world’s history, Eve is the symbol and the cause of a ruinous economy for all humanity. In opposition to her, God wanted another virgin, one who opens the new economy of redemption and salvation for all human creatures (18).

Virginity and maternity are the two evangelical and traditional statements on Mary, which Justin also stresses, yet in Christological contexts. These two prerogatives go together in the writings of Justin, because he understands very well that God’s economy required a virgin mother for the Incarnation of his Son.

Mary truly gave birth to Jesus, as every human mother gives birth to her children. We should not wonder if Justin does not attribute to Mary the title of mother and still less of Mother of God. The reasons are: first of all he always speaks about Christ and not initially about Mary, who enters the discourse only because of her function regarding the incarnate Word. Secondly the title of Mother of God will become current much later, especially at the time of the Nestorian heresy. Before that time, we do not have many witnesses for the use of this title. However, in the writings of Justin, the objective content of divine maternity is fully expressed. In fact, he insistently affirms that the Son of the unbegotten and invisible God and Creator, eternally begotten by him, but distinct from him, the Word by whom all things were made and left in them his own mark (19), who appeared and spoke with the patriarchs and prophets, according to the will of his Father, came down into the world and became man of the Virgin Mary, taking a true human flesh. Justin plainly affirms that the incarnate Son of God is one in being, one in substance, one in person. To this one being we refer all his words and all his deeds, both the human and the divine. Therefore we may presume that Justin thought that Mary was really the Mother of God, having conceived, carried in her womb and given birth to the eternal Word of God.

The difficult question could be raised: What was the real contribution which Mary, as Mother, gave to the conception of the Son of God? Did Justin consider Mary’s body the material cause of Christ’s humanity, namely its carnal root? He denies that the body of Christ was formed by male seed. He very seldom uses the preposition ek (from), whereas he very often states that the Son of God was born dia (through or by means) of the Virgin Mary. We can understand this terminology if we do not forget that Justin is something of a philosopher. He does not employ the expression: dia tes Parthenou (through the Virgin) to diminish or to depreciate Mary’s maternal activity in the conception of Christ, but only because this was the teaching of the biology of that time, according to which a woman was completely passive in the conception of babies. The only active principle was the man’s seed (Cf. 1 Cor 11:8 and 12).

Of course, in the conception of Christ, male seed was excluded; in fact, Justin speaks of a virginal conception in which the body of the incarnate Word was the result of the intervention of God’s almightiness which replaced man’s seed. But leaving aside the biological theory of that time, Justin seems very aware of the perfect maternal role played by Mary in the Incarnation. Like every other mother, Mary conceived; but she also carried in her womb and gave birth to the Son of God. Thus, she is indeed the Mother of the Son of God.

We already said that the virginal motherhood of Mary is firmly defended by Justin; it should be added that it is his main statement on Mary. In fact he was able to understand that virginal maternity was the condition which allowed Mary to enter the divine plan of salvation in a unique way. Differently from any other mother, she is the Virgin-Mother; Mother and Virgin at the same time. Justin had to face pagans and Jews. Pagans did not believe in the miracle of a Virgin-Mother; Jews were scandalized that one could state that God has a mother. Our apologist understands that no human proof is able to demonstrate such a miracle. Therefore, he feels compelled to have recourse to the prophecies of the Old Testament. He rightly identifies Mary with the virgin foretold by the prophet Isaiah (7:14). For him, Mary is the virgin par excellence, so that several times in his writings she is simply called: "the Virgin," without her name; saying "Mary" and saying "the Virgin" is the same thing. We ought not ask Justin whether he believed in the virginity ante-, in- and post-partum. This was not his problem, even though we may guess that his answer on this point would certainly be affirmative.

Between Ignatius of Antioch and Justin we have only a half-century of history, and we can notice how much the image of Mary has gained clearer and more detailed features. We are not yet dealing with a real Marian theology; but we notice that Justin feels the need to pay greater attention to the person of the Mother of Jesus in order to make more understandable the mystery of her divine Son.

Especially in the conception of the oikonomia, the teaching of our apologist represents a remarkable progress. In this economy, the Virgin Mary is shown in so active a role that our mind immediately goes to the concept of mediation (20).

However, the significance of the Marian texts of St. Justin can be compared with the texts of St. Ignatius. Justin was not a bishop like Ignatius, and therefore he was not a qualified witness and preacher of Divine Revelation. He was only a layman, a philosopher, who passionately cultivated Christian truth as it was transmitted by the Tradition of the Church. He is the first author who describes with remarkable extent the figure and the mission of Mary. For the first time, the traditional data are elaborated, developed and compared one with another, though we must not forget that Justin, in elaborating his teaching, is guided by apologetic and polemic criteria and not by theological principles. The importance of Justin is still greater if we consider that he knew perfectly the sources of Revelation, both the Old and the New Testament, and he had a considerable respect for them. For instance, he avoids taking away or adding anything to the Holy Scriptures. He searches in the Old Testament for a confirmation of the New; but he also interprets the Old Testament in the light arising from the New and especially from the divine person of the incarnate Word of God.

Moreover, the teaching of Justin can be referred to the entire Church of his time, because as a wandering philosopher he knew both Eastern and Western Christianity. For this reason his teaching about the Virgin Mary appears more universal than St. Ignatius’ and testifies that on the Mother of the Lord the unanimity of both the Eastern and Western churches is very ancient. Therefore we also understand why the teaching of the Fathers of the Church can offer a base for today’s ecumenical dialogue.

(to be continued)


 RETURN TO TOP
 

DIVINE MERCY

Dairy from St. Faustina

On Humility, Humiliation

 God Defends The Humble Soul

A humble soul does not trust itself, but places all its confidence in God. (Diary, 593).

God defends the humble soul and lets Himself into its secrets, and the soul abides in unsurpassable happiness which no one can comprehend (Diary, 593).

RETURN TO TOP

 

 CATHOLIC  TEACHING/CONVICTION/TESTIMONY

 

CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH

INSTRUCTION DIGNITAS PERSONAE

ON CERTAIN BIOETHICAL QUESTIONS

(continued)

First Part:

Anthropological, Theological and Ethical Aspects of
Human Life and Procreation

 4. In recent decades, medical science has made significant strides in understanding human life in its initial stages. Human biological structures and the process of human generation are better known. These developments are certainly positive and worthy of support when they serve to overcome or correct pathologies and succeed in re-establishing the normal functioning of human procreation. On the other hand, they are negative and cannot be utilized when they involve the destruction of human beings or when they employ means which contradict the dignity of the person or when they are used for purposes contrary to the integral good of man.

The body of a human being, from the very first stages of its existence, can never be reduced merely to a group of cells. The embryonic human body develops progressively according to a well-defined program with its proper finality, as is apparent in the birth of every baby.

It is appropriate to recall the fundamental ethical criterion expressed in the Instruction Donum vitae in order to evaluate all moral questions which relate to procedures involving the human embryo: “Thus the fruit of human generation, from the first moment of its existence, that is to say, from the moment the zygote has formed, demands the unconditional respect that is morally due to the human being in his bodily and spiritual totality. The human being is to be respected and treated as a person from the moment of conception; and therefore from that same moment his rights as a person must be recognized, among which in the first place is the inviolable right of every innocent human being to life”.[6]

5. This ethical principle, which reason is capable of recognizing as true and in conformity with the natural moral law, should be the basis for all legislation in this area.[7] In fact, it presupposes a truth of an ontological character, as Donum vitae demonstrated from solid scientific evidence, regarding the continuity in development of a human being.

If Donum vitae, in order to avoid a statement of an explicitly philosophical nature, did not define the embryo as a person, it nonetheless did indicate that there is an intrinsic connection between the ontological dimension and the specific value of every human life. Although the presence of the spiritual soul cannot be observed experimentally, the conclusions of science regarding the human embryo give “a valuable indication for discerning by the use of reason a personal presence at the moment of the first appearance of a human life: how could a human individual not be a human person?”.[8]  Indeed, the reality of the human being for the entire span of life, both before and after birth, does not allow us to posit either a change in nature or a gradation in moral value, since it possesses full anthropological and ethical status. The human embryo has, therefore, from the very beginning, the dignity proper to a person.

6. Respect for that dignity is owed to every human being because each one carries in an indelible way his own dignity and value. The origin of human life has its authentic context in marriage and in the family, where it is generated through an act which expresses the reciprocal love between a man and a woman. Procreation which is truly responsible vis-à-vis the child to be born “must be the fruit of marriage”.[9]

Marriage, present in all times and in all cultures, “is in reality something wisely and providently instituted by God the Creator with a view to carrying out his loving plan in human beings. Thus, husband and wife, through the reciprocal gift of themselves to the other – something which is proper and exclusive to them – bring about that communion of persons by which they perfect each other, so as to cooperate with God in the procreation and raising of new lives”.[10]  In the fruitfulness of married love, man and woman “make it clear that at the origin of their spousal life there is a genuine ‘yes’, which is pronounced and truly lived in reciprocity, remaining ever open to life... Natural law, which is at the root of the recognition of true equality between persons and peoples, deserves to be recognized as the source that inspires the relationship between the spouses in their responsibility for begetting new children. The transmission of life is inscribed in nature and its laws stand as an unwritten norm to which all must refer”.[11]

7. It is the Church’s conviction that what is human is not only received and respected by faith, but is also purified, elevated and perfected. God, after having created man in his image and likeness (cf. Gen 1:26), described his creature as “very good” (Gen 1:31), so as to be assumed later in the Son (cf. Jn 1:14). In the mystery of the Incarnation, the Son of God confirmed the dignity of the body and soul which constitute the human being. Christ did not disdain human bodiliness, but instead fully disclosed its meaning and value: “In reality, it is only in the mystery of the incarnate Word that the mystery of man truly becomes clear”.[12]

By becoming one of us, the Son makes it possible for us to become “sons of God” (Jn 1:12), “sharers in the divine nature” (2 Pet 1:4). This new dimension does not conflict with the dignity of the creature which everyone can recognize by the use of reason, but elevates it into a wider horizon of life which is proper to God, giving us the ability to reflect more profoundly on human life and on the acts by which it is brought into existence.[13]

The respect for the individual human being, which reason requires, is further enhanced and strengthened in the light of these truths of faith: thus, we see that there is no contradiction between the affirmation of the dignity and the affirmation of the sacredness of human life. “The different ways in which God, acting in history, cares for the world and for mankind are not mutually exclusive; on the contrary, they support each other and intersect. They have their origin and goal in the eternal, wise and loving counsel whereby God predestines men and women ‘to be conformed to the image of his Son’ (Rom 8:29)”.[14]

8. By taking the interrelationship of these two dimensions, the human and the divine, as the starting point, one understands better why it is that man has unassailable value: he possesses an eternal vocation and is called to share in the trinitarian love of the living God.

This value belongs to all without distinction. By virtue of the simple fact of existing, every human being must be fully respected. The introduction of discrimination with regard to human dignity based on biological, psychological, or educational development, or based on health-related criteria, must be excluded. At every stage of his existence, man, created in the image and likeness of God, reflects “the face of his Only-begotten Son… This boundless and almost incomprehensible love of God for the human being reveals the degree to which the human person deserves to be loved in himself, independently of any other consideration – intelligence, beauty, health, youth, integrity, and so forth. In short, human life is always a good, for it ‘is a manifestation of God in the world, a sign of his presence, a trace of his glory’ (Evangelium vitae, 34)”.[15]

9. These two dimensions of life, the natural and the supernatural, allow us to understand better the sense in which the acts that permit a new human being to come into existence, in which a man and a woman give themselves to each other, are a reflection of trinitarian love. “God, who is love and life, has inscribed in man and woman the vocation to share in a special way in his mystery of personal communion and in his work as Creator and Father”.[16]

Christian marriage is rooted “in the natural complementarity that exists between man and woman, and is nurtured through the personal willingness of the spouses to share their entire life-project, what they have and what they are: for this reason such communion is the fruit and the sign of a profoundly human need. But in Christ the Lord, God takes up this human need, confirms it, purifies it and elevates it, leading it to perfection through the sacrament of matrimony: the Holy Spirit who is poured out in the sacramental celebration offers Christian couples the gift of a new communion of love that is the living and real image of that unique unity which makes of the Church the indivisible Mystical Body of the Lord Jesus”.[17]

10. The Church, by expressing an ethical judgment on some developments of recent medical research concerning man and his beginnings, does not intervene in the area proper to medical science itself, but rather calls everyone to ethical and social responsibility for their actions. She reminds them that the ethical value of biomedical science is gauged in reference to both the unconditional respect owed to every human being at every moment of his or her existence, and the defense of the specific character of the personal act which transmits life. The intervention of the Magisterium falls within its mission of contributing to the formation of conscience, by authentically teaching the truth which is Christ and at the same time by declaring and confirming authoritatively the principles of the moral order which spring from human nature itself.[18]

(to be continued)
 

RETURN TO TOP

 

Monthly Index              General Archive 2008

General Archive 2007
General Archive 2006

General Archive 2005

General Archive 2004

 

Hit Counter
Hits since 3/16/2004

Màn điện toán toàn cầu của Thiếu Nhi Fatima được bắt đầu với trang Main từ ngày 9/12/1999,

nhưng mãi tới Mùa Hè 2001 mới tạm xong,

cuối cùng đã được chỉnh trang về cả hình thức lẫn nội dung từ mùa hè năm 2002,

để rồi chính thức tái ra mắt vào ngày 25/3/2003 cho đến nay.

 

TNFatima.org do Thiếu Nhi Fatima chủ trương và thực hiện

Mọi ý kiến đóng góp xin gửi về Webmaster