TRÁI TIM MẸ:  NƠI CON NƯƠNG NÁU - ĐƯỜNG ĐẾN VỚI CHÚA

"Chúa Giêsu muốn dùng con để làm cho Mẹ được nhận biết và yêu mến"

 

 

    January 26, 2009 - Monday in 3rd Week of Ordinary Time  

 

LITURGICAL/THEME MEDITATION:

"All sins will be forgiven except blasphemy against the Holy Spirit"

UNIVERSAL CHURCH/WORLD EVENT(S):

Decree Lifting Traditionalist Bishops' Excommunication;

Bishop's Response to Lifting of His Excommunication

SAINT OF THE DAY

Sts. Timothy and Titus

 GENERAL MARIOLOGY
Marian Devotion, the Rosary, and the Scapular

The Scapular Devotion

DIVINE MERCY

On Mercy

Pour Yourself Out Upon Us!

 TEACHING/TESTIMONY/CONVICTION:

Papal Homily at Conclusion of Unity Week

 

DAILY LITURGICAL MEDITATION

 
"All sins will be forgiven except blasphemy against the Holy Spirit"

Scripture:  Mark 3:22-30

22 And the scribes who came down from Jerusalem said, "He is possessed by Be-el'zebul, and by the prince of demons he casts out the demons." 23 And he called them to him, and said to them in parables, "How can Satan cast out Satan? 24 If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand. 25 And if a house is divided against itself, that house will not be able to stand. 26 And if Satan has risen up against himself and is divided, he cannot stand, but is coming to an end. 27 But no one can enter a strong man's house and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man; then indeed he may plunder his house. 28 "Truly, I say to you, all sins will be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they utter; 29 but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin" -- 30 for they had said, "He has an unclean spirit."

Meditation:  Do you ever feel harrassed by the devil? Jesus' numerous exorcisms brought freedom to many who were troubled and oppressed by the works of evil spirits. Jesus himself encountered personal opposition and battle with Satan when he was put to the test in the wilderness just before his public ministry. He overcame the evil one through his obedience to the will of his Father. Some of the Jewish leaders reacted vehemently to Jesus' healings and exorcisms and they opposed him with malicious slander. How could he get the power and authority to release individuals from Satan's power? They assumed that he had to be in league with Satan. They attributed his power to Satan rather than to God. Jesus answers their charge with two arguments. There were many exorcists in Palestine in Jesus' time. So Jesus retorted by saying that they also incriminate their own kin who cast out demons. If they condemn Jesus they also condemn themselves. In his second argument he asserts that no kingdom divided against itself cannot survive for long? We have witnessed enough civil wars in our own time to prove the destructive force at work here for the annihilation of whole peoples and their land. If Satan lends his power against his own forces then he is finished. How can a strong person  be defeated except by someone who is stronger? Jesus asserted his authority to cast out demons as a clear demonstration of the reign of God. God's power is clearly at work in the exorcisms which Jesus performed and they give evidence that God's kingdom has come.

What is the point of  Jesus' grim story about a strong man's house being occupied by an evil force? Our foe and the arch-enemy of God, who is Satan, is stronger than us. Unless we are clothed in God's strength, we cannot withstand Satan with our own human strength. What does Satan wish to take from us – our faith and confidence in God and our allegiance to follow God's law. Satan is a rebel and a liar. Satan can only have power or dominion over us if we listen to his lies and succumb to his will which is contrary to the will of God. Jesus makes it clear that there are no neutral parties in this world. We are either for Jesus or against him, for the kingdom of God or against it. There are two kingdoms in opposition to one another – the kingdom of God's light and truth and the kingdom of darkness and deception under the rule of Satan. If we disobey God's word, we open to door to the power of sin and Satan's influence in our lives. If we want to live in true freedom from the power of sin and Satan, then our "house" – our mind and heart and whatever we allow to control our appetites and desires – must be occupied and ruled by Jesus Christ where he is enthroned as Lord as Savior. Do you know the peace and security of a life submitted to God and his word?

What is the unforgivable sin which Jesus warns us to avoid? Jesus knows that his disciples will be tested and he assures them that the Holy Spirit will give them whatever grace and help they need in their time of adversity. He warns them, however, that it's possible to spurn the grace of God and to fall into apostasy (giving up the faith) out of cowardice or disbelief. Why is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit reprehensible? Blasphemy consists in uttering against God, inwardly or outwardly, words of hatred, reproach, or defiance. It's contrary to the respect due God and his holy name. Jesus speaks of blaspheming against the Holy Spirit as the unforgivable sin. Jesus spoke about this sin immediately after the scribes and Pharisees had attributed his miracles to the work of the devil instead of to God. A sin can only be unforgivable if repentance is impossible. If someone repeatedly closes their eyes to God, shuts their ears to his voice, and reject his word, they bring themselves to a point where they can no longer recognize God when he can be seen and heard. They become spiritually blind-sighted and speak of "evil as good and good as evil" (Isaiah 5:20).

To fear such a state of sin and spiritual blindness, however, signals that one is not dead to God and is conscious of the need for God's grace, mercy, and help. There are no limits to the mercy of God, but anyone who refuses to acknowledge and confess their sins and to ask God for forgiveness, spurns God's generous offer of mercy, pardon, grace, and healing. Through their own stubborn pride and wilfullness, they reject God, refuse his grace and help to turn away from sin, and reject the transforming power of the Holy Spirit to heal and restore them to wholeness. God always gives sufficient grace and help to all who humbly call upon him. Giving up on God and refusing to turn away from sin and disbelief results from pride and the loss of hope in God.

What is the basis of our hope and confidence in God? Through Jesus' death on the cross and his victory over the grave when he rose again on the third day, Satan has been defeated and death has been overcome. We now share in Christ's victory over sin and Satan and receive adoption as God's sons and daughters. Through the gift of the Holy Spirit, the Lord enables us to live a new life of love and freedom from slavery to sin. The Lord Jesus is our refuge and strength because he makes his home with us (John 15:4) and gives us the power and help of the Holy Spirit. Do you take refuge in the Lord and allow him to be the Lord of your life?

"Lord Jesus, you are my hope and salvation. Be the ruler of my heart and the master of my home. May there be nothing in my life that is not under your lordship."

Psalm 89:20-26

20 I have found David, my servant; with my holy oil I have anointed him;
21 so that my hand shall ever abide with him, my arm also shall strengthen him. 22 The enemy shall not outwit him, the wicked shall not humble him.
23 I will crush his foes before him and strike down those who hate him.
24 My faithfulness and my steadfast love shall be with him, and in my name shall his horn be exalted.
25 I will set his hand on the sea and his right hand on the rivers.
26 He shall cry to me, `Thou art my Father, my God, and the Rock of my salvation.'
 

www.dailyscripture.net
 

RETURN TO TOP
 

UNIVERSAL CHURCH/WORLD EVENTS

 

Decree Lifting Traditionalist Bishops' Excommunication


"A Sign for the Promotion of Unity in Charity"
 
VATICAN CITY, JAN. 25, 2009 (Zenit.org).- Here is a translation of the decree released Saturday by the Congregation for Bishops, advising of the lifting of excommunication of the four bishops ordained without papal permission by Marcel Lefebvre in 1988.

* * *

With a letter of Dec. 15, 2008, sent to His Eminence Cardinal Darío Castrillón Hoyos, president of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, Monsignor Bernard Fellay, in his name and in that of the other bishops consecrated June 30, 1988, again requested the lifting of the excommunication latae sententiae formally declared by decree of the prefect of this Congregation for Bishops on July 1, 1988.

In the mentioned letter, Monsignor Fellay affirms, among other things:

"We are always fervently determined in the will to be and to remain Catholics and to place all of our strength at the service of the Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ, which is the Roman Catholic Church. We accept all of her teachings with a filial spirit. We firmly believe in the primacy of Peter and in his prerogatives and because of this, the present situation makes us suffer so much."

His Holiness Benedict XVI, paternally sensitive to the spiritual unrest manifested by the interested parties because of the sanction of excommunication, and trusting in the commitment expressed by them in the cited letter to spare no effort in going deeper in the necessary conversations with the authorities of the Holy See in matters still unresolved, and to be able to thus arrive quickly to a full and satisfactory solution of the problem existing from the beginning, has decided to reconsider the canonical situation of the bishops Bernard Fellay, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, Richard Williamson and Alfonso de Galarreta, which arose with their episcopal consecration.

With this act it is desired to consolidate the mutual relations of trust, [and] to intensify and make more stable the relationship of the Fraternity of St. Pius X with the Apostolic See. This gift of peace, at the end of the celebrations of Christmas, also aims to be a sign for the promotion of unity in charity of the universal Church, and with this means, come to remove the scandal of division.

It is desired that this step be followed by the solicitous fulfillment of full communion with the Church of the Society of St. Pius X, thereby witnessing to authentic fidelity and a true recognition of the magisterium and the authority of the Pope, with the proof of visible unity.

In virtue of the faculties that have been expressly conceded to me by the Holy Father, Benedict XVI, in virtue of the present decree, I lift from Bishops Bernard Fellay, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, Richard Williamson and Alfonso de Galarreta the censure of excommunication latae sententiae declared by this congregation on July 1, 1988, and declare void of juridical effects beginning today the decree published then.

Rome, Congregation for the Bishops,


Jan. 21, 2009

Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re
Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops

 

Bishop's Response to Lifting of His Excommunication

"We Express Our Filial Gratitude to the Holy Father"


 
ROME, JAN. 25, 2009 (Zenit.org).- Here is a statement from Bishop Bernard Fellay, secretary-general of the Society of St. Pius X, in response to a decree published Saturday by the Congregation for Bishops, advising of the lifting of his excommunication and that of the three other bishops ordained without papal permission by Marcel Lefebvre in 1988.

* * *

Response From Leader of Society of St. Pius X

The excommunication of the bishops consecrated by His Grace Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, on June 30, 1988, which had been declared by the Congregation for Bishops in a decree dated July 1, 1988, and which we had always contested, has been withdrawn by another decree mandated by Benedict XVI and issued by the same Congregation on January 21, 2009.

We express our filial gratitude to the Holy Father for this gesture which, beyond the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X, will benefit the whole Church. Our Society wishes to be always more able to help the pope to remedy the unprecedented crisis which presently shakes the Catholic world, and which Pope John Paul II had designated as a state of "silent apostasy."

Besides our gratitude towards the Holy Father and towards all those who helped him to make this courageous act, we are pleased that the decree of January 21 considers as necessary "talks" with the Holy See, talks which will enable the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X to explain the fundamental doctrinal reasons which it believes to be at the origin of the present difficulties of the Church.

In this new atmosphere, we have the firm hope to obtain soon the recognition of the rights of Catholic Tradition.

Menzingen, January 24, 2009

Bernard Fellay

RETURN TO TOP
 

DAILY LITURGICAL SAINT

   

January 26, 2009

Sts. Timothy and Titus  

Timothy (d. 97?): What we know from the New Testament of Timothy’s life makes it sound like that of a modern harried bishop. He had the honor of being a fellow apostle with Paul, both sharing the privilege of preaching the gospel and suffering for it.

Timothy had a Greek father and a Jewish mother named Eunice. Being the product of a “mixed” marriage, he was considered illegitimate by the Jews. It was his grandmother, Lois, who first became Christian. Timothy was a convert of Paul around the year 47 and later joined him in his apostolic work. He was with Paul at the founding of the Church in Corinth. During the 15 years he worked with Paul, he became one of his most faithful and trusted friends. He was sent on difficult missions by Paul—often in the face of great disturbance in local Churches which Paul had founded.

Timothy was with Paul in Rome during the latter’s house arrest. At some period Timothy himself was in prison (Hebrews 13:23). Paul installed him as his representative at the Church of Ephesus.

Timothy was comparatively young for the work he was doing. (“Let no one have contempt for your youth,” Paul writes in 1 Timothy 4:12a.) Several references seem to indicate that he was timid. And one of Paul’s most frequently quoted lines was addressed to him: “Stop drinking only water, but have a little wine for the sake of your stomach and your frequent illnesses” (1 Timothy 5:23).

Titus (d. 94?): Titus has the distinction of being a close friend and disciple of Paul as well as a fellow missionary. He was Greek, apparently from Antioch. Even though Titus was a Gentile, Paul would not let him be forced to undergo circumcision at Jerusalem. Titus is seen as a peacemaker, administrator, great friend. Paul’s second letter to Corinth affords an insight into the depth of his friendship with Titus, and the great fellowship they had in preaching the gospel: “When I went to Troas...I had no relief in my spirit because I did not find my brother Titus. So I took leave of them and went on to Macedonia.... For even when we came into Macedonia, our flesh had no rest, but we were afflicted in every way—external conflicts, internal fears. But God, who encourages the downcast, encouraged us by the arrival of Titus...” (2 Corinthians 2:12a, 13; 7:5-6).

When Paul was having trouble with the community at Corinth, Titus was the bearer of Paul’s severe letter and was successful in smoothing things out. Paul writes he was strengthened not only by the arrival of Titus but also “by the encouragement with which he was encouraged in regard to you, as he told us of your yearning, your lament, your zeal for me, so that I rejoiced even more.... And his heart goes out to you all the more, as he remembers the obedience of all of you, when you received him with fear and trembling” (2 Corinthians 7:7a, 15).

The Letter to Titus addresses him as the administrator of the Christian community on the island of Crete, charged with organizing it, correcting abuses and appointing presbyter-bishops.

Comment:

In Titus we get another glimpse of life in the early Church: great zeal in the apostolate, great communion in Christ, great friendship. Yet always there is the problem of human nature and the unglamorous details of daily life: the need for charity and patience in “quarrels with others, fears within myself,” as Paul says. Through it all, the love of Christ sustained them. At the end of the Letter to Titus, Paul says that when the temporary substitute comes, “hurry to me.”

Quote:

“But when the kindness and generous love of God our Savior appeared, not because of any righteous deeds we had done but because of his mercy, he saved us through the bath of rebirth and renewal by the holy Spirit, whom he richly poured out on us through Jesus Christ our savior, so that we might be justified by his grace and become heirs in hope of eternal life. This saying is trustworthy” (Titus 3:4-8).

http://www.americancatholic.org/Features/SaintofDay

RETURN TO TOP
 

GENERAL MARIOLOGY


 

Marian Devotion, the Rosary, and the Scapular 

By Fr. Etienne Richer   

The following article is an excerpt from a chapter in the recently published Marian anthology, Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons, Seat of Wisdom Books, A Division of Queenship, 2008. Fifteen international Mariology experts contributed to the text. The book features a foreword by Archbishop Raymond L. Burke and has 17 chapters divided into four parts: 1. Mary in Scripture and the Early Church; 2. Marian Dogma; 3. Marian Doctrine; and 4. Marian Liturgy and Devotion. The book is now available from Queenship Publications. To obtain a copy, visit queenship.org. Visit books.google.com and search on "Mariology: A Guide" to view the book in its entirety, or simply click here.
Asst. Ed
.

The Scapular Devotion

In its origin, the scapular is a small version of the habit proper to a religious order. That is why it is also called a "little habit." The brown scapular of Our Lady of Mount Carmel is the best known and most widespread of these. Concretely, it is made up of two squares or rectangles of woolen fabric connected by two bands or cords; one of these pieces rests on the shoulders, between the shoulder-blades, the other on the chest of the person who wears it. For more than seven centuries, Marian piety has recognized in the scapular of Our Lady of Mount Carmel an authentic sign of belonging to Mary and a pledge of her motherly protection.

Numerous popes chose to vest themselves with the scapular of Carmel. Among the most recent, such was the case with popes Pius XII, John XXIII, and undoubtedly with the Carmelite tertiary John Paul II, who witnessed to this on several occasions (97). During the reform of the liturgical calendar, which was made following the Second Vatican Council, numerous celebrations linked to particular devotions were suppressed, but the memorial of the Virgin of Carmel was retained and with it the devotion conveyed by the scapular. This was a happy anticipation of the judgment recently formulated by Pope John Paul II on the occasion of the 750th anniversary of the giving of the scapular:

Over time this rich Marian heritage of Carmel has become, through the spread of the holy scapular devotion, a treasure for the whole Church. By its simplicity, its anthropological value and its relationship to Mary’s role in regard to the Church and humanity, this devotion was so deeply and widely accepted by the People of God that it came to be expressed in the memorial of July 16 on the liturgical calendar of the universal Church (98).

The Church has just given a new impetus to this devotional practice by the publication of the new ritual for the blessing and imposition of the scapular (99). All of the baptized may receive the scapular of Our Lady of Mount Carmel by which they recognize that they are called by God to be a part of a spiritual family consecrated to the love of the Virgin Mary and her cultus. The Directory on Popular Piety and the Liturgy (2002) makes mention of the scapular in the following terms:

The history of Marian piety also includes "devotion" to various scapulars, the most common of which is devotion to the Scapular of Our Lady of Mount Carmel. Its use is truly universal and, undoubtedly, it is one of those pious practices which the Council described as "recommended by the Magisterium throughout the centuries."

The Scapular of Mount Carmel is a reduced form of the religious habit of the Order of the Friars of the Blessed Virgin of Mount Carmel. Its use is very diffuse and often independent of the life and spirituality of the Carmelite family.

The scapular is an external sign of the filial relationship established between the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother and Queen of Mount Carmel, and the faithful who entrust themselves totally to her protection, who have recourse to her maternal intercession, who are mindful of the primacy of the spiritual life and need for prayer.

The scapular is imposed by a special rite of the Church which describes it as "a reminder that in baptism we have been clothed in Christ, with the assistance of the Blessed Virgin Mary, solicitous for our conformation to the Word incarnate, to the praise of the Trinity, we may come to our heavenly home wearing our nuptial garb" (Directory 205).

The origin of this devotion of the scapular is rooted in the historical events which marked the establishment of the Order of Carmel in the Church in the thirteenth century. According to an ancient tradition, while the English Carmelite St. Simon Stock (+1265) was beseeching the Virgin Mary for his order, whose prior general he was, by devoutly reciting the hymn Flos Carmeli, the Mother of God appeared to him holding in her hand the scapular and saying: "Behold the privilege which I give to you and to all the children of Carmel. Whoever dies vested in this habit will be saved." A slightly longer variant presents this statement: "he who dies wearing it will not suffer eternal fire (in hoc moriens aeternum non patietur incendium) … he will we saved" (100). This account belongs to the literary genre of exempla frequent in the Middle Ages, and the Marian vision which it contains is to be understood in the perspective which considers the religious life, or the simple association with a religious order, as a path toward eternal life. Beyond the particular historical circumstances which were at the origin of the reception of the scapular, a "venerable tradition of the order" (101), according to the happy expression of Pope John Paul II, recognized in this gift a privileged sign of the motherly protection of the Virgin Mary. This sign is rooted in the benevolent provision of God for all of his children. It should be noted that the response of the Virgin Mary to Simon Stock does not consist in a miracle worked in favor of the survival of Carmel in the West, but offers a reminder of the sense of Christian death and the promise of salvation.

The Constitution Lumen Gentium precisely recalled the perennially active role of the Mother of the Redeemer on our behalf:

After her Assumption into heaven she has not put aside this saving role, rather she continues by her multiform intercession to obtain for us the gift of eternal salvation. By her motherly charity she cares for the brethren of her Son who still journey on earth surrounded by dangers and difficulties until they are led into the happiness of their true home (LG 62).

From this conciliar text we can deduce, suggests the Italian Carmelite Antonio Sicari, that the promise made to St. Simon Stock is in some way part of the habitual activity of the Blessed Virgin: by her repeated intercession she continues to obtain for us the gifts which assure our eternal salvation (102).

A second privilege, called the "Sabbatine privilege" because it contains a promise of liberation from purgatory on the first Saturday after death, is rooted in another Marian vision, quite legendary, that was received by Pope John XXII (+1334), to whom is attributed the so-called bulla sabatina, which is unquestionably apocryphal. It remains nonetheless true that the content of this inauthentic bull was approved by popes from the time of Clement VII (+1534) in numerous papal documents and contributed much, just as the vision of St. Simon Stock, to the diffusion of the brown scapular. Under the pontificate of Paul V, a decree of the Congregation of the Index dated February 20, 1613, (and several times confirmed), authorized the preaching of the "Sabbatine privilege" but forbade that such preaching should make reference to the apocryphal bull attributed to John XXII (103). This precision, which has scarcely been heard, had the merit of clearly indicating that the profound meaning of the brown scapular and of the graces associated with it do not depend on visions which are historically more or less sure and of relative value, but translate, on the contrary, in practical and symbolic terms a correct understanding of the mystery of the cooperation of the Virgin Mary in our redemption and of her universal maternal mediation. The Carmelite Emanuele Boaga recently formulated a good doctrinal restatement on this matter:

Mary’s action in favor of those who wear the scapular is substantially, from the theological point of view, the concrete application of the doctrine of the spiritual maternity and of Marian mediation correctly understand in the order of dispositive causality: Mary works in us and we must be disposed to welcome her action and to respond with all of our strength, adhering to Christ offered to us by Mary. Therefore, this requires on our part the practical recognition of our dependence on Mary and on her role in the supernatural order of grace (104).

On the occasion of the celebration of the seventh centenary, Pope Pius XII, himself a member of the confraternity of the Scapular of Carmel, explicitly recommended the scapular devotion in his letter Neminem profecto latet, addressed to the general of the Carmelites and dated February 11, 1950, the day which commemorates the apparition of Our Lady at Lourdes:

As a Marian vestment, the sacred scapular is certainly a sign and guarantee of the protection of the Mother of God. However, let not those who wear it think that they can in sloth and indolence of spirit attain eternal life, for the apostle thus openly admonishes: "Work out your salvation in fear and trembling." Therefore, all Carmelites (whether in cloisters of the first or second order, in the regular or secular third order, or in the confraternities) who belong, by special particular bond of love, to the family that honors itself with the name of the most Blessed Virgin should recognize in this badge of the said Virgin a pattern of humility and chastity; in the very form of the vestment itself they should recognize an epitome of modesty and simplicity; above all they should see in the vestment itself, which they wear day and night, an eloquent expression of the prayers with which they ask for divine assistance; finally they should recognize in it an invitation to that consecration to the Immaculate Heart of the Virgin Mary which we recently recommended. On her part, the most holy Mother will not fail to intercede with God that her children who in purgatory are expiating their sins may, at the earliest possible moment, reach the eternal Fatherland in accordance with the so-called Sabbatine Privilege (105).

An attentive reading of these words of Pius XII brings one to recognize above all the reminder of the effective role of protection and of intercession of the Mother of God. Pope Pius XII underscores in this passage that the promises linked to the pious use of the scapular may not in any case be a reward for presumption: "let not those who wear it think that they can in sloth and indolence of spirit attain eternal life." In the same sense, St. Louis-Marie Grignion de Montfort, canonized by Pius XII in 1947, reproached the "presumptuous devotees" for sleeping in peace in their bad habits while saying that they wear the scapular (cf. TD 97).

A half century later, Pope John Paul II also took care to underscore the fact that the Marian scapular of Carmel is a sign of the "covenant" which obliges those who choose to wear it:

The sign of the scapular points to an effective synthesis of Marian spirituality, which nourishes the devotion of believers and makes them sensitive to the Virgin Mother’s loving presence in their lives. The scapular is essentially a "habit." Those who receive it are associated more or less closely with the Order of Carmel and dedicate themselves to the service of Our Lady for the good of the whole Church (cf. "Formula of Enrollment in the Scapular," in the Rite of Blessing of and Enrollment in the Scapular, approved by the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, January 5, 1996). Those who wear the scapular are thus brought into the land of Carmel, so that they may "eat its fruits and its good things" (cf. Jer. 2:7), and experience the loving and motherly presence of Mary in their daily commitment to be clothed in Jesus Christ and to manifest him in their life for the good of the Church and the whole of humanity (cf. "Formula of Enrollment in the Scapular," cit.).

Therefore, two truths are evoked by the sign of the scapular: on the one hand, the constant protection of the Blessed Virgin, not only on life’s journey, but also at the moment of passing into the fullness of eternal glory; on the other, the awareness that devotion to her cannot be limited to prayers and tributes in her honor on certain occasions, but must become a "habit," that is, a permanent orientation of one’s own Christian conduct, woven of prayer and interior life, through frequent reception of the sacraments and the concrete practice of the spiritual and corporal works of mercy. In this way the scapular becomes a sign of the "covenant" and reciprocal communion between Mary and the faithful: indeed it concretely translates the gift of his Mother, which Jesus gave on the Cross to John and, through him, to all of us, and the entrustment of the beloved apostle and of us to her, who became our spiritual Mother (106).

The two truths indicated by the scapular are on the one hand that of a permanent protection by Mary and on the other hand that of an permanent orientation of the faithful who pledge themselves in depth and lastingly. As Guillaume De Menthière summarizes:

The sign of the scapular evokes first of all the protection of the Virgin in the course of our days and up to the hour of our passing. It is a vestment which covers. But it is also a "habit," that is to say a habitual and permanent manner of the Christian life, woven by prayer and the interior life. For those who wear it, Marian devotion does not remain on the surface, exterior and peripheral, but becomes deep and from the heart (107).

Popes Pius XII and John Paul II have in common the fact that they both affirmed the explicit link between the spiritual tradition of the devotion of the scapular of Our Lady of Mount Carmel and the consecration to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. In his letter of February 11, 1950, already cited, Pius XII exhorted those who wear the scapular to make their consecration to the holy Immaculate Heart of the Virgin Mary. Pope John Paul II, in his letter addressed to the Carmelite Orders for the 750th anniversary of the giving of the scapular (2001), went still further in the same sense in affirming that the "most genuine form of devotion to the Blessed Virgin, expressed by the humble sign of the scapular, is consecration to her Immaculate Heart" (108). Thus the movement in favor of such a consecration, of which the Carmelite Sister Lucia of the Immaculate Heart of Mary was the witness and messenger before the popes (109), is related to the Carmelite heritage and in particular with the use of the Marian scapular.

* * *

Finally let us consider in concluding that if the wearing of the scapular, as also the prayer of the Rosary, are promoted by recommendations so explicit and consistently renewed by the Papal Magisterium, it is because it is dealing here with genuine means for growth in fidelity in the "Love of Jesus which we seek through Mary" (cf. TD 67).

At the same time sure and popular, these practices of Marian veneration are recognized by the Church as true "secrets" of grace, comparable to those which expert artisans kept among themselves in order to function effectively in their art with promptness and skillfulness. Under like circumstances, we are dealing with some privileged means, among others, in service of the Marian dimension of the pedagogy of prayer and holiness which the Servant of God John Paul II formulated as pastoral priorities for the third millennium (cf. Novo Millennio Ineunte 30-32) (110).

 (to be continued)


 RETURN TO TOP
 

DIVINE MERCY

 

Dairy from St. Faustina

On Mercy

Pour Yourself Out Upon Us!

Hide me, Jesus, in the depths of Your mercy, and then let my neighbor judge me as he pleases (Diary, 791).

You are a bottomless sea of mercy for us sinners; and the greater the misery, the more right we have to Your mercy (Diary, 793).

†  O inexhaustible spring of Divine Mercy, pour Yourself out upon us! Your Goodness knows no limits (Diary, 819).

Who will ever conceive and understand the depth of mercy that has gushed forth from Your Heart? (Diary, 832).

RETURN TO TOP

 

 CATHOLIC  TEACHING/CONVICTION/TESTIMONY

 

Papal Homily at Conclusion of Unity Week

"Why Have You Wounded the Unity of My Body?"

 
VATICAN CITY, JAN. 25, 2009 (Zenit.org).- Here is a translation of the homily Benedict XVI gave today at the celebration of vespers for the feast of the Conversion of St. Paul. With this ceremony, held at the Basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls, the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity concluded.

Representatives of Churches and ecclesial communities of Rome were present at the event.

* * *

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

It is a great joy every time we find ourselves gathered at the tomb of the Apostle Paul on the liturgical feast of his conversion to conclude the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity. I greet all of you with affection. I greet in a special way Cardinal Cordero Lanza di Montezemolo, the abbot and the community of monks who are hosting us. I also greet Cardinal Kasper, the president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity. I greet along with him the lord cardinals who are present, the bishops and the pastors of the various Churches and ecclesial communities gathered here this evening.

A special word of recognition goes to those who worked together in preparing the prayer guides, experiencing firsthand the exercise of reflecting and meeting in listening to each other and, all together, to the Word of God.

St. Paul's conversion offers us a model that shows us the way to full unity. Unity in fact requires a conversion: from division to communion, from broken unity to healed and full unity. This conversion is the gift of the Risen Christ, as it was for St. Paul. We heard this from the Apostle himself in the reading proclaimed just a moment ago: "By the grace of God I am what I am" (1 Corinthians 15:10).

The same Lord, who called Saul on the road to Damascus, addresses himself to the members of the Church -- which is one and holy -- and calling each by name asks: Why have you divided me? Why have you wounded the unity of my body?

Conversion implies two dimensions. In the first step we recognize our faults in the light of Christ, and this recognition becomes sorrow and repentance, desire for a new beginning. In the second step we recognize that this new road cannot come from us. It consists in letting ourselves be conquered by Christ. As St. Paul says: "I continue my pursuit in hope that I may possess it, since I have indeed been conquered by Christ Jesus" (Philippians 3:12).

Conversion demands our yes, my "pursuit"; it is not ultimately my activity, but a gift, a letting ourselves be formed by Christ; it is death and resurrection. This is why St. Paul does not say: "I converted" but rather "I died" (Galatians 2:19), I am a new creature. In reality, St. Paul's conversion was not a passage from immorality to morality, from a mistaken faith to a right faith, but it was a being conquered by Christ: the renunciation of his own perfection; it was the humility of one who puts himself without reserve in the service of Christ for the brethren. And only in this renunciation of ourselves, in this conforming to Christ are we also united among ourselves; we become "one" in Christ. It is communion with the risen Christ that gives us unity.

We can observe an interesting analogy with the dynamic of St. Paul's conversion also in meditating on the biblical text of the prophet Ezekiel (37:15-28), which was chosen as a basis for our prayer this year. In it, in fact, the symbolic gesture is presented of two sticks being joined into one in the prophet's hand, who represents God's future action with this gesture. It is the second part of Chapter 37, which in the first part contains the celebrated vision of the dry bones and the resurrection of Israel, worked by the Spirit of God.

How can we not see that the prophetic sign of the reunification of the people of Israel is placed after the great symbol of the dry bones brought to life by the Spirit? There follows from this a theological pattern analogous to that of St. Paul's conversion: God's power is first and he works the resurrection as a new creation by his Spirit. This God, who is the Creator and is able to resurrect the dead, is also able to bring a people divided in two back to unity.

Paul -- like Ezekiel but more than Ezekiel -- becomes the chosen instrument of the preaching of the unity won by Christ through his cross and resurrection: the unity between the Jews and the pagans, to form one new people. Christ's resurrection extends the boundary of unity: not only the unity of the tribes of Israel, but the unity of the Jews and the pagans (cf. Ephesians 2; John 10:16); the unification of humanity dispersed by sin and still more the unity of all who believe in Christ.

We owe this choice of the passage from the prophet Ezekiel to our Korean brothers, who felt the call of this biblical passage strongly, both as Koreans and Christians. In the division of the Jewish people into two kingdoms they saw themselves reflected, the children of one land who, on account of political events, have been divided, north from south. Their human experience helped them to better understand the drama of the division among Christians.

Now, from this Word of God, chosen by our Korean brothers and proposed to all, a truth full of hope emerges: God allows his people a new unity, which must be a sign and an instrument of reconciliation and peace, even at the historical level, for all nations. The unity that God gives his Church, and for which we pray, is naturally communion in the spiritual sense, in faith and in charity; but we know that this unity in Christ is also the ferment of fraternity in the social sphere, in relations between nations and for the whole human family. It is the leaven of the Kingdom of God that makes all the dough rise (cf. Matthew 13:33).

In this sense, the prayer that we offer up in these days, taking our cue from the prophecy of Ezekiel, has also become intercession for the different situations of conflict that afflict humanity at present. There where human words become powerless, because the tragic noise of violence and arms prevails, the prophetic power of the Word of God does not weaken and it repeats to us that peace is possible, and that we must be instruments of reconciliation and peace. For this reason our prayer for unity and peace always requires confirmation by courageous gestures of reconciliation among us Christians.

Once again I think of the Holy Land: how important it is that the faithful who live there, and the pilgrims who travel there, offer a witness to everyone that diversity of rites and traditions need not be an obstacle to mutual respect and to fraternal charity. In the legitimate diversity of different positions we must seek unity in faith, in our fundamental "yes" to Christ and to his one Church. And thus the differences will no longer be an obstacle that separates but richness in the multiplicity of the expressions of a common faith.

I would like to conclude this reflection of mine with a reference to an event that we older people here have certainly not forgotten. In this place on Jan. 25, 1959, exactly 50 years ago, Blessed Pope John XXIII announced for this first time his desire to convoke "an ecumenical Council for the universal Church" (AAS LI [1959], p. 68). He made this announcement to the cardinals in the chapter room of the Monastery of St. Paul, after having celebrated solemn Mass in the Basilica.

From the providential decision, suggested to my venerable predecessor, according to his firm conviction, by the Holy Spirit, there also derived a fundamental contribution to ecumenism, condensed in the decree "Unitatis Redintegratio." In that document we read: "There can be no ecumenism worthy of the name without a change of heart. For it is from renewal of the inner life of our minds, from self-denial and an unstinted love that desires of unity take their rise and develop in a mature way" (7).

The attitude of interior conversion in Christ, of spiritual renewal, of increased charity toward other Christians, created a new situation in ecumenical relations. The fruits of theological dialogues, with their convergences and with the more precise identification of the differences that still remain, led to a courageous pursuit in two directions: in the reception of what was positively achieved and a renewed dedication to the future.

Opportunely, the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, which I thank for the service it renders to all the disciples of the Lord, has recently reflected on the reception and future of ecumenical dialogue. Such a reflection, if on one hand rightly desires to emphasize what has already been achieved, on the other hand intends to find new ways to continue the relations between the Churches and the ecclesial Communities in the present context.

The horizon of full unity remains open before us. It is an arduous task, but it is exciting for those Christians who want to live in harmony with the prayer of the Lord: "that all be one so that the world believes" (John 17:21). The Second Vatican Council explained to us "that human powers and capacities cannot achieve this holy objective -- the reconciling of all Christians in the unity of the one and only Church of Christ" ("Unitatis redintegratio," 24).

Trusting in the prayer of the Lord Jesus Christ, and encouraged by the significant steps made by the ecumenical movement, with faith we invoke the Holy Spirit that he continue to illumine our path. May the Apostle Paul, who worked so hard and suffered for the unity of the mystical body of Christ, spur us on from heaven; and may the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of the unity of the Church, accompany and sustain us.

 

RETURN TO TOP

 

Monthly Index              General Archive 2008

General Archive 2007
General Archive 2006

General Archive 2005

General Archive 2004

 

Hit Counter
Hits since 3/16/2004

Màn điện toán toàn cầu của Thiếu Nhi Fatima được bắt đầu với trang Main từ ngày 9/12/1999,

nhưng măi tới Mùa Hè 2001 mới tạm xong,

cuối cùng đă được chỉnh trang về cả h́nh thức lẫn nội dung từ mùa hè năm 2002,

để rồi chính thức tái ra mắt vào ngày 25/3/2003 cho đến nay.

 

TNFatima.org do Thiếu Nhi Fatima chủ trương và thực hiện

Mọi ư kiến đóng góp xin gửi về Webmaster