| |
| |

|
TRÁI TIM
MẸ: NƠI CON NƯƠNG NÁU - ĐƯỜNG ĐẾN VỚI CHÚA |
|
"Chúa Giêsu muốn dùng con để làm
cho Mẹ được nhận biết và yêu mến" |
|
January 26, 2009 - Monday in 3rd
Week of Ordinary Time
LITURGICAL/THEME MEDITATION:
"All sins will be forgiven except blasphemy against the
Holy Spirit"
UNIVERSAL CHURCH/WORLD EVENT(S):
Decree Lifting
Traditionalist Bishops' Excommunication;
Bishop's Response to Lifting
of His Excommunication
SAINT OF THE DAY
Sts. Timothy and
Titus
GENERAL
MARIOLOGY
Marian Devotion, the
Rosary, and the Scapular
The Scapular Devotion
DIVINE MERCY
On Mercy
Pour Yourself Out Upon Us!
TEACHING/TESTIMONY/CONVICTION:
Papal Homily at Conclusion
of Unity Week

|
|
DAILY LITURGICAL MEDITATION |
|
"All sins will be forgiven except blasphemy
against the Holy Spirit"
Scripture: Mark 3:22-30
22 And the scribes who came down from Jerusalem said, "He is
possessed by Be-el'zebul, and by the prince of demons he casts out the
demons." 23 And he called them to him, and said to them in parables,
"How can Satan cast out Satan? 24 If a kingdom is divided against
itself, that kingdom cannot stand. 25 And if a house is divided against
itself, that house will not be able to stand. 26 And if Satan has risen
up against himself and is divided, he cannot stand, but is coming to an
end. 27 But no one can enter a strong man's house and plunder his goods,
unless he first binds the strong man; then indeed he may plunder his
house. 28 "Truly, I say to you, all sins will be forgiven the sons of
men, and whatever blasphemies they utter; 29 but whoever blasphemes
against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an
eternal sin" -- 30 for they had said, "He has an unclean spirit."
Meditation: Do you ever feel harrassed by the devil? Jesus'
numerous exorcisms brought freedom to many who were troubled and
oppressed by the works of evil spirits. Jesus himself encountered
personal opposition and battle with Satan when he was put to the test in
the wilderness just before his public ministry. He overcame the evil one
through his obedience to the will of his Father. Some of the Jewish
leaders reacted vehemently to Jesus' healings and exorcisms and they
opposed him with malicious slander. How could he get the power and
authority to release individuals from Satan's power? They assumed that
he had to be in league with Satan. They attributed his power to Satan
rather than to God. Jesus answers their charge with two arguments. There
were many exorcists in Palestine in Jesus' time. So Jesus retorted by
saying that they also incriminate their own kin who cast out demons. If
they condemn Jesus they also condemn themselves. In his second argument
he asserts that no kingdom divided against itself cannot survive for
long? We have witnessed enough civil wars in our own time to prove the
destructive force at work here for the annihilation of whole peoples and
their land. If Satan lends his power against his own forces then he is
finished. How can a strong person be defeated except by someone who is
stronger? Jesus asserted his authority to cast out demons as a clear
demonstration of the reign of God. God's power is clearly at work in the
exorcisms which Jesus performed and they give evidence that God's
kingdom has come.
What is the point of Jesus' grim story about a strong man's house
being occupied by an evil force? Our foe and the arch-enemy of God, who
is Satan, is stronger than us. Unless we are clothed in God's strength,
we cannot withstand Satan with our own human strength. What does Satan
wish to take from us – our faith and confidence in God and our
allegiance to follow God's law. Satan is a rebel and a liar. Satan can
only have power or dominion over us if we listen to his lies and succumb
to his will which is contrary to the will of God. Jesus makes it clear
that there are no neutral parties in this world. We are either for Jesus
or against him, for the kingdom of God or against it. There are two
kingdoms in opposition to one another – the kingdom of God's light and
truth and the kingdom of darkness and deception under the rule of Satan.
If we disobey God's word, we open to door to the power of sin and
Satan's influence in our lives. If we want to live in true freedom from
the power of sin and Satan, then our "house" – our mind and heart and
whatever we allow to control our appetites and desires – must be
occupied and ruled by Jesus Christ where he is enthroned as Lord as
Savior. Do you know the peace and security of a life submitted to God
and his word?
What is the unforgivable sin which Jesus warns us to avoid? Jesus
knows that his disciples will be tested and he assures them that the
Holy Spirit will give them whatever grace and help they need in their
time of adversity. He warns them, however, that it's possible to spurn
the grace of God and to fall into apostasy (giving up the faith) out of
cowardice or disbelief. Why is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit
reprehensible? Blasphemy consists in uttering against God, inwardly or
outwardly, words of hatred, reproach, or defiance. It's contrary to the
respect due God and his holy name. Jesus speaks of blaspheming against
the Holy Spirit as the unforgivable sin. Jesus spoke about this sin
immediately after the scribes and Pharisees had attributed his miracles
to the work of the devil instead of to God. A sin can only be
unforgivable if repentance is impossible. If someone repeatedly closes
their eyes to God, shuts their ears to his voice, and reject his word,
they bring themselves to a point where they can no longer recognize God
when he can be seen and heard. They become spiritually blind-sighted and
speak of "evil as good and good as evil" (Isaiah 5:20).
To fear such a state of sin and spiritual blindness, however, signals
that one is not dead to God and is conscious of the need for God's
grace, mercy, and help. There are no limits to the mercy of God, but
anyone who refuses to acknowledge and confess their sins and to ask God
for forgiveness, spurns God's generous offer of mercy, pardon, grace,
and healing. Through their own stubborn pride and wilfullness, they
reject God, refuse his grace and help to turn away from sin, and reject
the transforming power of the Holy Spirit to heal and restore them to
wholeness. God always gives sufficient grace and help to all who humbly
call upon him. Giving up on God and refusing to turn away from sin and
disbelief results from pride and the loss of hope in God.
What is the basis of our hope and confidence in God? Through Jesus'
death on the cross and his victory over the grave when he rose again on
the third day, Satan has been defeated and death has been overcome. We
now share in Christ's victory over sin and Satan and receive adoption as
God's sons and daughters. Through the gift of the Holy Spirit, the Lord
enables us to live a new life of love and freedom from slavery to sin.
The Lord Jesus is our refuge and strength because he makes his home with
us (John 15:4) and gives us the power and help of the Holy Spirit. Do
you take refuge in the Lord and allow him to be the Lord of your life?
"Lord Jesus, you are my hope and salvation. Be the ruler of my heart
and the master of my home. May there be nothing in my life that is not
under your lordship."
Psalm 89:20-26
20 I have found David, my servant; with my holy oil I have anointed
him;
21 so that my hand shall ever abide with him, my arm also shall
strengthen him. 22 The enemy shall not outwit him, the wicked shall not
humble him.
23 I will crush his foes before him and strike down those who hate him.
24 My faithfulness and my steadfast love shall be with him, and in my
name shall his horn be exalted.
25 I will set his hand on the sea and his right hand on the rivers.
26 He shall cry to me, `Thou art my Father, my God, and the Rock of my
salvation.'
www.dailyscripture.net
RETURN
TO TOP
|
|
UNIVERSAL CHURCH/WORLD EVENTS |
Decree Lifting Traditionalist Bishops' Excommunication
"A Sign for the Promotion of Unity in Charity"
VATICAN CITY, JAN. 25, 2009 ( Zenit.org).- Here is a translation of the decree released Saturday by the Congregation for Bishops, advising of the lifting of excommunication of the four bishops ordained without papal permission by Marcel Lefebvre in 1988.
* * *
With a letter of Dec. 15, 2008, sent to His Eminence Cardinal Darío Castrillón Hoyos, president of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, Monsignor Bernard Fellay, in his name and in that of the other bishops consecrated June 30, 1988, again requested the lifting of the excommunication latae sententiae formally declared by decree of the prefect of this Congregation for Bishops on July 1, 1988.
In the mentioned letter, Monsignor Fellay affirms, among other things:
"We are always fervently determined in the will to be and to remain Catholics and to place all of our strength at the service of the Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ, which is the Roman Catholic Church. We accept all of her teachings with a filial spirit. We firmly believe in the primacy of Peter and in his prerogatives and because of this, the present situation makes us suffer so much."
His Holiness Benedict XVI, paternally sensitive to the spiritual unrest manifested by the interested parties because of the sanction of excommunication, and trusting in the commitment expressed by them in the cited letter to spare no effort in going deeper in the necessary conversations with the authorities of the Holy See in matters still unresolved, and to be able to thus arrive quickly to a full and satisfactory solution of the problem existing from the beginning, has decided to reconsider the canonical situation of the bishops Bernard Fellay, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, Richard Williamson and Alfonso de Galarreta, which arose with their episcopal consecration.
With this act it is desired to consolidate the mutual relations of trust, [and] to intensify and make more stable the relationship of the Fraternity of St. Pius X with the Apostolic See. This gift of peace, at the end of the celebrations of Christmas, also aims to be a sign for the promotion of unity in charity of the universal Church, and with this means, come to remove the scandal of division.
It is desired that this step be followed by the solicitous fulfillment of full communion with the Church of the Society of St. Pius X, thereby witnessing to authentic fidelity and a true recognition of the magisterium and the authority of the Pope, with the proof of visible unity.
In virtue of the faculties that have been expressly conceded to me by the Holy Father, Benedict XVI, in virtue of the present decree, I lift from Bishops Bernard Fellay, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, Richard Williamson and Alfonso de Galarreta the censure of excommunication latae sententiae declared by this congregation on July 1, 1988, and declare void of juridical effects beginning today the decree published then.
Rome, Congregation for the Bishops,
Jan. 21, 2009
Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re
Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops
Bishop's Response to Lifting of His Excommunication
"We Express Our Filial Gratitude to the Holy Father"
ROME, JAN. 25, 2009 ( Zenit.org).- Here is a statement from Bishop Bernard Fellay, secretary-general of the Society of St. Pius X, in response to a decree published Saturday by the Congregation for Bishops, advising of the lifting of his excommunication and that of the three other bishops ordained without papal permission by Marcel Lefebvre in 1988.
* * *
Response From Leader of Society of St. Pius X
The excommunication of the bishops consecrated by His Grace Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, on June 30, 1988, which had been declared by the Congregation for Bishops in a decree dated July 1, 1988, and which we had always contested, has been withdrawn by another decree mandated by Benedict XVI and issued by the same Congregation on January 21, 2009.
We express our filial gratitude to the Holy Father for this gesture which, beyond the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X, will benefit the whole Church. Our Society wishes to be always more able to help the pope to remedy the unprecedented crisis which presently shakes the Catholic world, and which Pope John Paul II had designated as a state of "silent apostasy."
Besides our gratitude towards the Holy Father and towards all those who helped him to make this courageous act, we are pleased that the decree of January 21 considers as necessary "talks" with the Holy See, talks which will enable the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X to explain the fundamental doctrinal reasons which it believes to be at the origin of the present difficulties of the Church.
In this new atmosphere, we have the firm hope to obtain soon the recognition of the rights of Catholic Tradition.
Menzingen, January 24, 2009
Bernard Fellay
RETURN
TO TOP
|
|
DAILY LITURGICAL SAINT |
|

January 26, 2009

Sts. Timothy and Titus
Timothy (d. 97?):
What we know from the New Testament of Timothy’s life makes it sound
like that of a modern harried bishop. He had the honor of being a fellow
apostle with Paul, both sharing the privilege of preaching the gospel
and suffering for it.
Timothy had a Greek father and a Jewish mother named Eunice. Being the
product of a “mixed” marriage, he was considered illegitimate by the
Jews. It was his grandmother, Lois, who first became Christian. Timothy
was a convert of Paul around the year 47 and later joined him in his
apostolic work. He was with Paul at the founding of the Church in
Corinth. During the 15 years he worked with Paul, he became one of his
most faithful and trusted friends. He was sent on difficult missions by
Paul—often in the face of great disturbance in local Churches which Paul
had founded.
Timothy was with Paul in Rome during the latter’s house arrest. At some
period Timothy himself was in prison (Hebrews 13:23). Paul installed him
as his representative at the Church of Ephesus.
Timothy was comparatively young for the work he was doing. (“Let no one
have contempt for your youth,” Paul writes in 1 Timothy 4:12a.) Several
references seem to indicate that he was timid. And one of Paul’s most
frequently quoted lines was addressed to him: “Stop drinking only water,
but have a little wine for the sake of your stomach and your frequent
illnesses” (1 Timothy 5:23).
Titus (d. 94?):
Titus has the distinction of being a close friend and disciple of Paul
as well as a fellow missionary. He was Greek, apparently from Antioch.
Even though Titus was a Gentile, Paul would not let him be forced to
undergo circumcision at Jerusalem. Titus is seen as a peacemaker,
administrator, great friend. Paul’s second letter to Corinth affords an
insight into the depth of his friendship with Titus, and the great
fellowship they had in preaching the gospel: “When I went to Troas...I
had no relief in my spirit because I did not find my brother Titus. So I
took leave of them and went on to Macedonia.... For even when we came
into Macedonia, our flesh had no rest, but we were afflicted in every
way—external conflicts, internal fears. But God, who encourages the
downcast, encouraged us by the arrival of Titus...” (2 Corinthians
2:12a, 13; 7:5-6).
When Paul was having trouble with the community at Corinth, Titus was
the bearer of Paul’s severe letter and was successful in smoothing
things out. Paul writes he was strengthened not only by the arrival of
Titus but also “by the encouragement with which he was encouraged in
regard to you, as he told us of your yearning, your lament, your zeal
for me, so that I rejoiced even more.... And his heart goes out to you
all the more, as he remembers the obedience of all of you, when you
received him with fear and trembling” (2 Corinthians 7:7a, 15).
The Letter to Titus addresses him as the administrator of the Christian
community on the island of Crete, charged with organizing it, correcting
abuses and appointing presbyter-bishops.
Comment:
In Titus we get another glimpse of life in the early Church: great zeal
in the apostolate, great communion in Christ, great friendship. Yet
always there is the problem of human nature and the unglamorous details
of daily life: the need for charity and patience in “quarrels with
others, fears within myself,” as Paul says. Through it all, the love of
Christ sustained them. At the end of the Letter to Titus, Paul says that
when the temporary substitute comes, “hurry to me.”
Quote:
“But when the kindness and generous love of God our Savior appeared, not
because of any righteous deeds we had done but because of his mercy, he
saved us through the bath of rebirth and renewal by the holy Spirit,
whom he richly poured out on us through Jesus Christ our savior, so that
we might be justified by his grace and become heirs in hope of eternal
life. This saying is trustworthy” (Titus 3:4-8).
http://www.americancatholic.org/Features/SaintofDay
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
GENERAL
MARIOLOGY |
Marian Devotion, the Rosary, and the Scapular
By Fr.
Etienne Richer
The
following article is an excerpt from a chapter in the recently published
Marian anthology, Mariology: A
Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons,
Seat of Wisdom Books, A Division of Queenship, 2008. Fifteen
international Mariology experts contributed to the text. The book
features a foreword by Archbishop Raymond L. Burke and has 17 chapters
divided into four parts: 1. Mary in Scripture and the Early Church; 2.
Marian Dogma; 3. Marian Doctrine; and 4. Marian Liturgy and Devotion.
The book is now available from Queenship Publications. To obtain a copy,
visit
queenship.org.
Visit
books.google.com and search on "Mariology: A Guide" to view the book
in its entirety, or simply
click here.
Asst. Ed.
The Scapular Devotion
In
its origin, the scapular is a small version of the habit proper to a
religious order. That is why it is also called a "little habit." The
brown scapular of Our Lady of Mount Carmel is the best known and most
widespread of these. Concretely, it is made up of two squares or
rectangles of woolen fabric connected by two bands or cords; one of
these pieces rests on the shoulders, between the shoulder-blades, the
other on the chest of the person who wears it. For more than seven
centuries, Marian piety has recognized in the scapular of Our Lady of
Mount Carmel an authentic sign of belonging to Mary and a pledge of her
motherly protection.
Numerous popes chose to vest themselves with the scapular of Carmel.
Among the most recent, such was the case with popes Pius XII, John
XXIII, and undoubtedly with the Carmelite tertiary John Paul II, who
witnessed to this on several occasions (97). During the reform of the
liturgical calendar, which was made following the Second Vatican
Council, numerous celebrations linked to particular devotions were
suppressed, but the memorial of the Virgin of Carmel was retained and
with it the devotion conveyed by the scapular. This was a happy
anticipation of the judgment recently formulated by Pope John Paul II on
the occasion of the 750th anniversary of the giving of the scapular:
Over
time this rich Marian heritage of Carmel has become, through the spread
of the holy scapular devotion, a treasure for the whole Church. By its
simplicity, its anthropological value and its relationship to Mary’s
role in regard to the Church and humanity, this devotion was so deeply
and widely accepted by the People of God that it came to be expressed in
the memorial of July 16 on the liturgical calendar of the universal
Church (98).
The
Church has just given a new impetus to this devotional practice by the
publication of the new ritual for the blessing and imposition of the
scapular (99). All of the baptized may receive the scapular of Our Lady
of Mount Carmel by which they recognize that they are called by God to
be a part of a spiritual family consecrated to the love of the Virgin
Mary and her cultus. The Directory on Popular Piety and the
Liturgy (2002) makes mention of the scapular in the following terms:
The
history of Marian piety also includes "devotion" to various scapulars,
the most common of which is devotion to the Scapular of Our Lady of
Mount Carmel. Its use is truly universal and, undoubtedly, it is one of
those pious practices which the Council described as "recommended by the
Magisterium throughout the centuries."
The
Scapular of Mount Carmel is a reduced form of the religious habit of the
Order of the Friars of the Blessed Virgin of Mount Carmel. Its use is
very diffuse and often independent of the life and spirituality of the
Carmelite family.
The
scapular is an external sign of the filial relationship established
between the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother and Queen of Mount Carmel, and
the faithful who entrust themselves totally to her protection, who have
recourse to her maternal intercession, who are mindful of the primacy of
the spiritual life and need for prayer.
The
scapular is imposed by a special rite of the Church which describes it
as "a reminder that in baptism we have been clothed in Christ, with the
assistance of the Blessed Virgin Mary, solicitous for our conformation
to the Word incarnate, to the praise of the Trinity, we may come to our
heavenly home wearing our nuptial garb" (Directory 205).
The
origin of this devotion of the scapular is rooted in the historical
events which marked the establishment of the Order of Carmel in the
Church in the thirteenth century. According to an ancient tradition,
while the English Carmelite St. Simon Stock (+1265) was beseeching the
Virgin Mary for his order, whose prior general he was, by devoutly
reciting the hymn Flos Carmeli, the Mother of God appeared to him
holding in her hand the scapular and saying: "Behold the privilege which
I give to you and to all the children of Carmel. Whoever dies vested in
this habit will be saved." A slightly longer variant presents this
statement: "he who dies wearing it will not suffer eternal fire (in
hoc moriens aeternum non patietur incendium) … he will we saved"
(100). This account belongs to the literary genre of exempla
frequent in the Middle Ages, and the Marian vision which it contains is
to be understood in the perspective which considers the religious life,
or the simple association with a religious order, as a path toward
eternal life. Beyond the particular historical circumstances which were
at the origin of the reception of the scapular, a "venerable tradition
of the order" (101), according to the happy expression of Pope John Paul
II, recognized in this gift a privileged sign of the motherly protection
of the Virgin Mary. This sign is rooted in the benevolent provision of
God for all of his children. It should be noted that the response of the
Virgin Mary to Simon Stock does not consist in a miracle worked in favor
of the survival of Carmel in the West, but offers a reminder of the
sense of Christian death and the promise of salvation.
The
Constitution Lumen Gentium precisely recalled the perennially
active role of the Mother of the Redeemer on our behalf:
After
her Assumption into heaven she has not put aside this saving role,
rather she continues by her multiform intercession to obtain for us the
gift of eternal salvation. By her motherly charity she cares for the
brethren of her Son who still journey on earth surrounded by dangers and
difficulties until they are led into the happiness of their true home (LG
62).
From
this conciliar text we can deduce, suggests the Italian Carmelite
Antonio Sicari, that the promise made to St. Simon Stock is in some way
part of the habitual activity of the Blessed Virgin: by her repeated
intercession she continues to obtain for us the gifts which assure our
eternal salvation (102).
A
second privilege, called the "Sabbatine privilege" because it contains a
promise of liberation from purgatory on the first Saturday after death,
is rooted in another Marian vision, quite legendary, that was received
by Pope John XXII (+1334), to whom is attributed the so-called bulla
sabatina, which is unquestionably apocryphal. It remains nonetheless
true that the content of this inauthentic bull was approved by popes
from the time of Clement VII (+1534) in numerous papal documents and
contributed much, just as the vision of St. Simon Stock, to the
diffusion of the brown scapular. Under the pontificate of Paul V, a
decree of the Congregation of the Index dated February 20, 1613, (and
several times confirmed), authorized the preaching of the "Sabbatine
privilege" but forbade that such preaching should make reference to the
apocryphal bull attributed to John XXII (103). This precision, which has
scarcely been heard, had the merit of clearly indicating that the
profound meaning of the brown scapular and of the graces associated with
it do not depend on visions which are historically more or less sure and
of relative value, but translate, on the contrary, in practical and
symbolic terms a correct understanding of the mystery of the cooperation
of the Virgin Mary in our redemption and of her universal maternal
mediation. The Carmelite Emanuele Boaga recently formulated a good
doctrinal restatement on this matter:
Mary’s action in favor of those who wear the scapular is substantially,
from the theological point of view, the concrete application of the
doctrine of the spiritual maternity and of Marian mediation correctly
understand in the order of dispositive causality: Mary works in us and
we must be disposed to welcome her action and to respond with all of our
strength, adhering to Christ offered to us by Mary. Therefore, this
requires on our part the practical recognition of our dependence on Mary
and on her role in the supernatural order of grace (104).
On
the occasion of the celebration of the seventh centenary, Pope Pius XII,
himself a member of the confraternity of the Scapular of Carmel,
explicitly recommended the scapular devotion in his letter Neminem
profecto latet, addressed to the general of the Carmelites and dated
February 11, 1950, the day which commemorates the apparition of Our Lady
at Lourdes:
As a
Marian vestment, the sacred scapular is certainly a sign and guarantee
of the protection of the Mother of God. However, let not those who wear
it think that they can in sloth and indolence of spirit attain eternal
life, for the apostle thus openly admonishes: "Work out your salvation
in fear and trembling." Therefore, all Carmelites (whether in cloisters
of the first or second order, in the regular or secular third order, or
in the confraternities) who belong, by special particular bond of love,
to the family that honors itself with the name of the most Blessed
Virgin should recognize in this badge of the said Virgin a pattern of
humility and chastity; in the very form of the vestment itself they
should recognize an epitome of modesty and simplicity; above all they
should see in the vestment itself, which they wear day and night, an
eloquent expression of the prayers with which they ask for divine
assistance; finally they should recognize in it an invitation to that
consecration to the Immaculate Heart of the Virgin Mary which we
recently recommended. On her part, the most holy Mother will not fail to
intercede with God that her children who in purgatory are expiating
their sins may, at the earliest possible moment, reach the eternal
Fatherland in accordance with the so-called Sabbatine Privilege (105).
An
attentive reading of these words of Pius XII brings one to recognize
above all the reminder of the effective role of protection and of
intercession of the Mother of God. Pope Pius XII underscores in this
passage that the promises linked to the pious use of the scapular may
not in any case be a reward for presumption: "let not those who wear it
think that they can in sloth and indolence of spirit attain eternal
life." In the same sense, St. Louis-Marie Grignion de Montfort,
canonized by Pius XII in 1947, reproached the "presumptuous devotees"
for sleeping in peace in their bad habits while saying that they wear
the scapular (cf. TD 97).
A
half century later, Pope John Paul II also took care to underscore the
fact that the Marian scapular of Carmel is a sign of the "covenant"
which obliges those who choose to wear it:
The
sign of the scapular points to an effective synthesis of Marian
spirituality, which nourishes the devotion of believers and makes them
sensitive to the Virgin Mother’s loving presence in their lives. The
scapular is essentially a "habit." Those who receive it are associated
more or less closely with the Order of Carmel and dedicate themselves to
the service of Our Lady for the good of the whole Church (cf. "Formula
of Enrollment in the Scapular," in the Rite of Blessing of and
Enrollment in the Scapular, approved by the Congregation for Divine
Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, January 5, 1996). Those
who wear the scapular are thus brought into the land of Carmel, so that
they may "eat its fruits and its good things" (cf. Jer. 2:7), and
experience the loving and motherly presence of Mary in their daily
commitment to be clothed in Jesus Christ and to manifest him in their
life for the good of the Church and the whole of humanity (cf. "Formula
of Enrollment in the Scapular," cit.).
Therefore, two truths are evoked by the sign of the scapular: on the one
hand, the constant protection of the Blessed Virgin, not only on life’s
journey, but also at the moment of passing into the fullness of eternal
glory; on the other, the awareness that devotion to her cannot be
limited to prayers and tributes in her honor on certain occasions, but
must become a "habit," that is, a permanent orientation of one’s own
Christian conduct, woven of prayer and interior life, through frequent
reception of the sacraments and the concrete practice of the spiritual
and corporal works of mercy. In this way the scapular becomes a sign of
the "covenant" and reciprocal communion between Mary and the faithful:
indeed it concretely translates the gift of his Mother, which Jesus gave
on the Cross to John and, through him, to all of us, and the entrustment
of the beloved apostle and of us to her, who became our spiritual Mother
(106).
The
two truths indicated by the scapular are on the one hand that of a
permanent protection by Mary and on the other hand that of an permanent
orientation of the faithful who pledge themselves in depth and
lastingly. As Guillaume De Menthière summarizes:
The
sign of the scapular evokes first of all the protection of the Virgin in
the course of our days and up to the hour of our passing. It is a
vestment which covers. But it is also a "habit," that is to say a
habitual and permanent manner of the Christian life, woven by prayer and
the interior life. For those who wear it, Marian devotion does not
remain on the surface, exterior and peripheral, but becomes deep and
from the heart (107).
Popes
Pius XII and John Paul II have in common the fact that they both
affirmed the explicit link between the spiritual tradition of the
devotion of the scapular of Our Lady of Mount Carmel and the
consecration to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. In his letter of February
11, 1950, already cited, Pius XII exhorted those who wear the scapular
to make their consecration to the holy Immaculate Heart of the Virgin
Mary. Pope John Paul II, in his letter addressed to the Carmelite Orders
for the 750th anniversary of the giving of the scapular (2001), went
still further in the same sense in affirming that the "most genuine form
of devotion to the Blessed Virgin, expressed by the humble sign of the
scapular, is consecration to her Immaculate Heart" (108). Thus the
movement in favor of such a consecration, of which the Carmelite Sister
Lucia of the Immaculate Heart of Mary was the witness and messenger
before the popes (109), is related to the Carmelite heritage and in
particular with the use of the Marian scapular.
* * *
Finally let us consider in concluding that if the wearing of the
scapular, as also the prayer of the Rosary, are promoted by
recommendations so explicit and consistently renewed by the Papal
Magisterium, it is because it is dealing here with genuine means for
growth in fidelity in the "Love of Jesus which we seek through Mary"
(cf. TD 67).
At
the same time sure and popular, these practices of Marian veneration are
recognized by the Church as true "secrets" of grace, comparable to those
which expert artisans kept among themselves in order to function
effectively in their art with promptness and skillfulness. Under like
circumstances, we are dealing with some privileged means, among others,
in service of the Marian dimension of the pedagogy of prayer and
holiness which the Servant of God John Paul II formulated as pastoral
priorities for the third millennium (cf. Novo Millennio Ineunte
30-32) (110).
(to be
continued)
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
DIVINE MERCY
|
On Mercy
Pour Yourself Out Upon
Us!
Hide me, Jesus, in the
depths of Your mercy, and then let my neighbor judge me as
he pleases (Diary, 791).
You are a bottomless sea of mercy for us sinners; and the
greater the misery, the more right we have to Your mercy (Diary,
793).
† O inexhaustible spring of Divine Mercy, pour Yourself out
upon us! Your Goodness knows no limits (Diary, 819).
Who will ever conceive and understand the depth of mercy
that has gushed forth from Your Heart? (Diary, 832).
RETURN TO TOP |
|
CATHOLIC TEACHING/CONVICTION/TESTIMONY |
Papal Homily at
Conclusion of
Unity Week
"Why Have
You Wounded the
Unity of My
Body?"
VATICAN
CITY, JAN.
25, 2009 ( Zenit.org).-
Here is a
translation
of the
homily
Benedict XVI
gave today
at the
celebration
of vespers
for the
feast of the
Conversion
of St. Paul.
With this
ceremony,
held at the
Basilica of
St. Paul
Outside the
Walls, the
Week of
Prayer for
Christian
Unity
concluded.
Representatives
of Churches
and
ecclesial
communities
of Rome were
present at
the event.
* * *
Dear
Brothers and
Sisters,
It is a
great joy
every time
we find
ourselves
gathered at
the tomb of
the Apostle
Paul on the
liturgical
feast of his
conversion
to conclude
the Week of
Prayer for
Christian
Unity. I
greet all of
you with
affection. I
greet in a
special way
Cardinal
Cordero
Lanza di
Montezemolo,
the abbot
and the
community of
monks who
are hosting
us. I also
greet
Cardinal
Kasper, the
president of
the
Pontifical
Council for
Promoting
Christian
Unity. I
greet along
with him the
lord
cardinals
who are
present, the
bishops and
the pastors
of the
various
Churches and
ecclesial
communities
gathered
here this
evening.
A special
word of
recognition
goes to
those who
worked
together in
preparing
the prayer
guides,
experiencing
firsthand
the exercise
of
reflecting
and meeting
in listening
to each
other and,
all
together, to
the Word of
God.
St.
Paul's
conversion
offers us a
model that
shows us the
way to full
unity. Unity
in fact
requires a
conversion:
from
division to
communion,
from broken
unity to
healed and
full unity.
This
conversion
is the gift
of the Risen
Christ, as
it was for
St. Paul. We
heard this
from the
Apostle
himself in
the reading
proclaimed
just a
moment ago:
"By the
grace of God
I am what I
am" (1
Corinthians
15:10).
The same
Lord, who
called Saul
on the road
to Damascus,
addresses
himself to
the members
of the
Church --
which is one
and holy --
and calling
each by name
asks: Why
have you
divided me?
Why have you
wounded the
unity of my
body?
Conversion
implies two
dimensions.
In the first
step we
recognize
our faults
in the light
of Christ,
and this
recognition
becomes
sorrow and
repentance,
desire for a
new
beginning.
In the
second step
we recognize
that this
new road
cannot come
from us. It
consists in
letting
ourselves be
conquered by
Christ. As
St. Paul
says: "I
continue my
pursuit in
hope that I
may possess
it, since I
have indeed
been
conquered by
Christ
Jesus"
(Philippians
3:12).
Conversion
demands our
yes, my
"pursuit";
it is not
ultimately
my activity,
but a gift,
a letting
ourselves be
formed by
Christ; it
is death and
resurrection.
This is why
St. Paul
does not
say: "I
converted"
but rather
"I died"
(Galatians
2:19), I am
a new
creature. In
reality, St.
Paul's
conversion
was not a
passage from
immorality
to morality,
from a
mistaken
faith to a
right faith,
but it was a
being
conquered by
Christ: the
renunciation
of his own
perfection;
it was the
humility of
one who puts
himself
without
reserve in
the service
of Christ
for the
brethren.
And only in
this
renunciation
of
ourselves,
in this
conforming
to Christ
are we also
united among
ourselves;
we become
"one" in
Christ. It
is communion
with the
risen Christ
that gives
us unity.
We can
observe an
interesting
analogy with
the dynamic
of St.
Paul's
conversion
also in
meditating
on the
biblical
text of the
prophet
Ezekiel
(37:15-28),
which was
chosen as a
basis for
our prayer
this year.
In it, in
fact, the
symbolic
gesture is
presented of
two sticks
being joined
into one in
the
prophet's
hand, who
represents
God's future
action with
this
gesture. It
is the
second part
of Chapter
37, which in
the first
part
contains the
celebrated
vision of
the dry
bones and
the
resurrection
of Israel,
worked by
the Spirit
of God.
How can
we not see
that the
prophetic
sign of the
reunification
of the
people of
Israel is
placed after
the great
symbol of
the dry
bones
brought to
life by the
Spirit?
There
follows from
this a
theological
pattern
analogous to
that of St.
Paul's
conversion:
God's power
is first and
he works the
resurrection
as a new
creation by
his Spirit.
This God,
who is the
Creator and
is able to
resurrect
the dead, is
also able to
bring a
people
divided in
two back to
unity.
Paul --
like Ezekiel
but more
than Ezekiel
-- becomes
the chosen
instrument
of the
preaching of
the unity
won by
Christ
through his
cross and
resurrection:
the unity
between the
Jews and the
pagans, to
form one new
people.
Christ's
resurrection
extends the
boundary of
unity: not
only the
unity of the
tribes of
Israel, but
the unity of
the Jews and
the pagans
(cf.
Ephesians 2;
John 10:16);
the
unification
of humanity
dispersed by
sin and
still more
the unity of
all who
believe in
Christ.
We owe
this choice
of the
passage from
the prophet
Ezekiel to
our Korean
brothers,
who felt the
call of this
biblical
passage
strongly,
both as
Koreans and
Christians.
In the
division of
the Jewish
people into
two kingdoms
they saw
themselves
reflected,
the children
of one land
who, on
account of
political
events, have
been
divided,
north from
south. Their
human
experience
helped them
to better
understand
the drama of
the division
among
Christians.
Now, from
this Word of
God, chosen
by our
Korean
brothers and
proposed to
all, a truth
full of hope
emerges: God
allows his
people a new
unity, which
must be a
sign and an
instrument
of
reconciliation
and peace,
even at the
historical
level, for
all nations.
The unity
that God
gives his
Church, and
for which we
pray, is
naturally
communion in
the
spiritual
sense, in
faith and in
charity; but
we know that
this unity
in Christ is
also the
ferment of
fraternity
in the
social
sphere, in
relations
between
nations and
for the
whole human
family. It
is the
leaven of
the Kingdom
of God that
makes all
the dough
rise (cf.
Matthew
13:33).
In this
sense, the
prayer that
we offer up
in these
days, taking
our cue from
the prophecy
of Ezekiel,
has also
become
intercession
for the
different
situations
of conflict
that afflict
humanity at
present.
There where
human words
become
powerless,
because the
tragic noise
of violence
and arms
prevails,
the
prophetic
power of the
Word of God
does not
weaken and
it repeats
to us that
peace is
possible,
and that we
must be
instruments
of
reconciliation
and peace.
For this
reason our
prayer for
unity and
peace always
requires
confirmation
by
courageous
gestures of
reconciliation
among us
Christians.
Once
again I
think of the
Holy Land:
how
important it
is that the
faithful who
live there,
and the
pilgrims who
travel
there, offer
a witness to
everyone
that
diversity of
rites and
traditions
need not be
an obstacle
to mutual
respect and
to fraternal
charity. In
the
legitimate
diversity of
different
positions we
must seek
unity in
faith, in
our
fundamental
"yes" to
Christ and
to his one
Church. And
thus the
differences
will no
longer be an
obstacle
that
separates
but richness
in the
multiplicity
of the
expressions
of a common
faith.
I would
like to
conclude
this
reflection
of mine with
a reference
to an event
that we
older people
here have
certainly
not
forgotten.
In this
place on
Jan. 25,
1959,
exactly 50
years ago,
Blessed Pope
John XXIII
announced
for this
first time
his desire
to convoke
"an
ecumenical
Council for
the
universal
Church" (AAS
LI [1959],
p. 68). He
made this
announcement
to the
cardinals in
the chapter
room of the
Monastery of
St. Paul,
after having
celebrated
solemn Mass
in the
Basilica.
From the
providential
decision,
suggested to
my venerable
predecessor,
according to
his firm
conviction,
by the Holy
Spirit,
there also
derived a
fundamental
contribution
to
ecumenism,
condensed in
the decree "Unitatis
Redintegratio."
In that
document we
read: "There
can be no
ecumenism
worthy of
the name
without a
change of
heart. For
it is from
renewal of
the inner
life of our
minds, from
self-denial
and an
unstinted
love that
desires of
unity take
their rise
and develop
in a mature
way" (7).
The
attitude of
interior
conversion
in Christ,
of spiritual
renewal, of
increased
charity
toward other
Christians,
created a
new
situation in
ecumenical
relations.
The fruits
of
theological
dialogues,
with their
convergences
and with the
more precise
identification
of the
differences
that still
remain, led
to a
courageous
pursuit in
two
directions:
in the
reception of
what was
positively
achieved and
a renewed
dedication
to the
future.
Opportunely,
the
Pontifical
Council for
Promoting
Christian
Unity, which
I thank for
the service
it renders
to all the
disciples of
the Lord,
has recently
reflected on
the
reception
and future
of
ecumenical
dialogue.
Such a
reflection,
if on one
hand rightly
desires to
emphasize
what has
already been
achieved, on
the other
hand intends
to find new
ways to
continue the
relations
between the
Churches and
the
ecclesial
Communities
in the
present
context.
The
horizon of
full unity
remains open
before us.
It is an
arduous
task, but it
is exciting
for those
Christians
who want to
live in
harmony with
the prayer
of the Lord:
"that all be
one so that
the world
believes"
(John
17:21). The
Second
Vatican
Council
explained to
us "that
human powers
and
capacities
cannot
achieve this
holy
objective --
the
reconciling
of all
Christians
in the unity
of the one
and only
Church of
Christ" ("Unitatis
redintegratio,"
24).
Trusting
in the
prayer of
the Lord
Jesus
Christ, and
encouraged
by the
significant
steps made
by the
ecumenical
movement,
with faith
we invoke
the Holy
Spirit that
he continue
to illumine
our path.
May the
Apostle
Paul, who
worked so
hard and
suffered for
the unity of
the mystical
body of
Christ, spur
us on from
heaven; and
may the
Blessed
Virgin Mary,
Mother of
the unity of
the Church,
accompany
and sustain
us.
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
Monthly Index
General Archive
2008
General Archive
2007
General Archive
2006
General Archive 2005
General Archive 2004 |
|
|
|

Hits since 3/16/2004
Màn điện
toán toàn cầu của Thiếu Nhi Fatima được bắt đầu với trang Main từ ngày
9/12/1999,
nhưng
măi tới Mùa Hè 2001 mới tạm xong,
cuối
cùng đă được chỉnh trang về cả h́nh thức lẫn nội dung từ mùa hè năm
2002,
để rồi
chính thức tái ra mắt vào ngày 25/3/2003 cho đến nay.
TNFatima.org
do
Thiếu Nhi Fatima
chủ trương và thực hiện
Mọi ư kiến
đóng góp xin gửi về
Webmaster
|

|
|
|
|