TRÁI TIM MẸ:  NƠI CON NƯƠNG NÁU - ĐƯỜNG ĐẾN VỚI CHÚA

"Chúa Giêsu muốn dùng con để làm cho Mẹ được nhận biết và yêu mến"

 

 

  October 27/2009 -  Tuesday of 30th Week of Ordinary Time   

 

LITURGICAL/THEME MEDITATION:

"What God's kingdom is like"

UNIVERSAL CHURCH/WORLD EVENT(S):

Scholars Aim to Disprove Darwin

SAINT OF THE DAY

Blessed Bartholomew of Vicenza

 GENERAL MARIOLOGY
Book Six - Chapter   VI

JESUS BROUGHT BEFORE PILATE. THE SCOURGING AND

CROWNING WITH THORNS.

 DIVINE MERCY

Divine Mercy in My Soul

NOTEBOOK VI

 TEACHING/TESTIMONY/CONVICTION:

Live-in Love: Till Inconvenience Do Us Apart

 

DAILY LITURGICAL MEDITATION

 
 
Tuesday (10/27): "What God's kingdom is like"

Scripture:  Luke 13:18-21

18 He said therefore, "What is the kingdom of God like? And to what shall I compare it? 19 It is like a grain of mustard seed which a man took and sowed in his garden; and it grew and became a tree, and the birds of the air made nests in its branches." 20 And again he said, "To what shall I compare the kingdom of God? 21 It is like leaven which a woman took and hid in three measures of flour, till it was all leavened."

Meditation: What can mustard seeds and leaven teach us about the kingdom of God? The tiny mustard seed literally grew to be a tree which attracted numerous birds because they loved the little black mustard seed it produced. God's kingdom works in a similar fashion. It starts from the smallest beginnings in the hearts of men and women who are receptive to God's word. And it works unseen and causes a transformation from within. Leaven is another powerful agent of change. A lump of dough left to itself remains just what it is, a lump of dough. But when the leaven is added to it a transformation takes place which produces rich and wholesome bread when heated – the staple of life for humans. The kingdom of God produces a transformation in those who receive the new life which Jesus Christ offers. When we yield to Jesus Christ, our lives are transformed by the power of the Holy Spirit who dwells in us. Paul the Apostle says, "we have this treasure in earthen vessels, to show that the transcendent power belongs to God and not to us" (2 Corinthians 4:7). Do you believe in the transforming power of the Holy Spirit?

"Lord Jesus, fill me with your Holy Spirit and transform me into the Christ-like holiness you desire. Increase my zeal for your kingdom and instill in me a holy desire to live for your greater glory."
 

Psalm 126

1 When the LORD restored the fortunes of Zion, we were like those who dream.
2 Then our mouth was filled with laughter, and our tongue with shouts of joy; then they said among the nations, "The LORD has done great things for them."
3 The LORD has done great things for us; we are glad.
4 Restore our fortunes, O LORD, like the watercourses in the Negev!
5 May those who sow in tears reap with shouts of joy!
6 He that goes forth weeping, bearing the seed for sowing, shall come home with shouts of joy, bringing his sheaves with him.
 

www.dailyscripture.net
 

RETURN TO TOP
 

UNIVERSAL CHURCH/WORLD EVENTS

 

Scholars Aim to Disprove Darwin


As Theory Turns 150, Scientists Say It's Impossible
 
ROME, OCT. 26, 2009 (Zenit.org).- As the theory of evolution turns 150 years old, one group of scholars is calling it a scientific impossibility.

After a year of conferences celebrating the 150th anniversary of Darwin's 1859 book, "On the Origin of Species," a Nov. 9 conference is planned to provide empirical proof to debunk evolution.

Rome's Pope Pius V University will host the daylong conference that will present a scientific refutation of evolution theory.

Peter Wilders and H. M. Owen, organizers of the event, told ZENIT that the conference is aimed to "stimulate debate among scientists" and that it is particularly geared to university students.

"Being young, they have less built-in resistance to new data that conflicts with establishment dogma," a statement from the organizers explained.

"Darwinian evolution has become the accepted paradigm of the scientific community," they noted. "New research data that challenges that paradigm is automatically rejected for philosophical rather than scientific reasons.

"Results of recent empirical research published by scientific academies refutes the basic principles of the geological time-scale. It reduces the age of rocks and therefore the fossils in them. The theory of evolution is undergirded by both the time-scale and the age of fossils.

"This evidence from sedimentology harmonizes with the latest findings in genetics, paleontology, physics, and other scientific disciplines. The implications of this research are fatal for Darwinism."

Not available

According to Russian sedimentologist Alexander Lalamov, "Everything contained in Darwin’s 'Origin of Species' depends upon rocks forming slowly over enormous periods of time. The November conference demonstrates with empirical data that such geological time is not available for evolution."

Recently returned from a geological conference in Kazan, sedimentologist Guy Berthault will present the findings of several sedimentological studies conducted and published in Russia. In one of these, the age of the rock formation surveyed was found to be 0.01% of the age attributed to it by the geological time-scale -- instead of an age of 10,000,000 years, the actual age was no more than 10,000 years.

"Contrary to conventional wisdom," Lalamov observed, "these rocks formed quickly, and the fossils they contain must be relatively young. This finding contradicts the evolutionary interpretation of the fossil record."

According to U.S. biophysicist Dean Kenyon, "Biological macroevolution collapses without the twin pillars of the geological time-scale and the fossil record as currently interpreted. Few scientists would contest this statement. This is why the upcoming conference concentrates on geology and paleontology. Recent research in these two disciplines adds powerful support to the already formidable case against teaching Darwinian macroevolution as if it were proven fact."

"The Scientific Impossibility of Evolution" conference is being held in direct response to Benedict XVI's request that both sides of the evolution controversy be heard.

Thomas Seiler, a participant in the conference, said: "In the light of astounding new scientific breakthroughs, particularly in geology, we hope the worldwide scientific community will acknowledge the overwhelming evidence against the theory of evolution."
 

TURN TO TOP

 

DAILY LITURGICAL SAINT

   

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Blessed Bartholomew of Vicenza

(c. 1200-1271)

 

Dominicans honor one of their own today, Blessed Bartholomew of Vicenza. This was a man who used his skills as a preacher to challenge the heresies of his day.

Bartholomew was born in Vicenza around 1200. At 20 he entered the Dominicans. Following his ordination he served in various leadership positions. As a young priest he founded a military order whose purpose was to keep civil peace in towns throughout Italy.

In 1248, Bartholomew was appointed a bishop. For most men, such an appointment is an honor and a tribute to their holiness and their demonstrated leadership skills. But for Bartholomew, it was a form of exile that had been urged by an antipapal group that was only too happy to see him leave for Cyprus. Not many years later, however, Bartholomew was transferred back to Vicenza. Despite the antipapal feelings that were still evident, he worked diligently—especially through his preaching—to rebuild his diocese and strengthen the people’s loyalty to Rome.

During his years as bishop in Cyprus, Bartholomew befriended King Louis the Ninth of France, who is said to have given the holy bishop a relic of Christ’s Crown of Thorns.

Bartholomew died in 1271. He was beatified in 1793.
 

http://www.americancatholic.org/Features/SaintofDay

RETURN TO TOP
 

GENERAL MARIOLOGY


 

THE DIVINE HISTORY AND LIFE

OF THE

VIRGIN MOTHER OF GOD

BOOK SIX

The Marriage at Cana; How Most Holy Mary Accompanied the Re-

deemer of the World in His Preaching: the Humility shown by the

Heavenly Queen in regard to the Miracles Wrought by Her

Divine Son;The Transfiguration of the Lord;His Entrance

into Jerusalem; His Passion and Death; His Triumph

over Lucifer and his Demons by His Death on

the Cross; the Most Sacred Resurrection

of the Savior and His Wonderful As-

cension into Heaven

CHAPTER VI.

JESUS BROUGHT BEFORE PILATE. THE SCOURGING AND

CROWNING WITH THORNS.

The sun had already arisen while these things happened and the most holy Mother, who saw it all from afar, now resolved to leave her retreat and follow her divine Son to the house of Pilate and to his death on the Cross. When the great Queen and Lady was about to set forth from the Cenacle, saint John arrived in order to give an account of all that was happening; for the beloved disciple at that time did not know the visions, by which all the doings and sufferings of her most holy Son were manifest to the blessed Mother. After the denial of saint Peter, saint John had retired and had observed, more from afar what was going on. Recognizing also the wickedness of his flight in the garden, he confessed it to the Mother of God and asked her pardon as soon as he came into her presence; and then he gave an account of all that passed in his heart and of what he had done and what he had seen in following his Master. Saint John thought it well to prepare the afflicted Mother for her meeting with her most holy Son, in order that She might not be overcome by the fearful spectacle of his present condition. Therefore He sought to impress Her beforehand with some image of his sufferings by saying: "O my Lady, in what a state of suffering is our divine Master! The sight of Him cannot but break one's heart; for by the buffets and the blows and by the spittle, his most beautiful countenance is so disfigured and defiled, that Thou wilt scarcely recognize Him with thy own eyes." The most prudent Lady listened to his description, as if She knew nothing of the events; but She broke out in bitterest tears of heart-rending sorrow. The holy women, who had came forth with the Lady, also listened to saint John, and all of them were filled with grief and terror at his words. The Queen of heaven asked the Apostle to accompany Her and the devout women, and, exhorting them all, She said: "Let us hasten our steps, in order that my eyes may see the Son of the eternal Father, who took human form in my womb; and you shall see, my dearest friends, to what the love of mankind has driven Him, my Lord and God, and what it costs Him to redeem men from sin and death, and to open for them the gates of heaven."

The Queen of heaven set forth through the streets of Jerusalem accompanied by saint John and by some holy women. Of these not all, but only the three Marys and other very pious women, followed Her to the end. With Her were also the angels of her guard, whom She asked to open a way for Her to her divine Son. The holy angels obeyed and acted as her guard. On the streets She heard the people expressing their various opinions and sentiments concerning the sorrowful events now transpiring in reference to Jesus of Nazareth. The more kindly hearted lamented over his fate, and they were fewest in number. Others spake about the intention of his enemies to crucify Him; others related where He now was and how He was conducted through the streets, bound as a criminal; others spoke of the illtreatment He was undergoing; others asked, what evil He had done, that He should be so misused; others again in their astonishment and in their doubts, exclaimed: To this then have his miracles brought Him! Without a doubt they were all impostures, since He cannot defend or free himself!

Through the swarming and confused crowds the angels conducted the Empress of heaven to a sharp turn of the street, where She met her most holy Son. With the profoundest reverence She prostrated Herself before his sovereign Person and adored it more fervently and with a reverence more deep and more ardent than ever was given or ever shall be given to it by all the creatures. She arose and then the Mother and Son looked upon each other with ineffable tenderness, interiorly conversing with each other in transports of an unspeakable sorrow. The most prudent Lady stepped aside and then followed Christ our Lord, continuing at a distance her interior communication with Him and with the eternal Father. The words of her soul are not for the mortal and corruptible tongue.

 
 RETURN TO TOP
 

DIVINE MERCY

 

Divine Mercy In my soul
 

The Mercy of the Lord I will sing Forever.
Divine Mercy in my soul.
Sr. Faustina, Diary
 

NOTEBOOK V I

J.M.J.
 

Struggle with a certain temptation. There was a person who kept accosting me with flattering words, and since he knew when I went out to go to the chapel or to the veranda, he would bar my way. Since he did not dare approach me by himself, he found another person like himself, but neither of them dared approach. As I was on my way to the May devotions, they were already standing there where I had to pass. I hadn’t yet reached them when I heard inciting words, directed at me. And the Lord permitted me to know the intentions of their hearts, which were not good. I felt they would block my way after the service, and then I would have to talk to them, for up to that time, I hadn’t said a word.

When I left the chapel, they were there, armed and waiting for me to pass. This time, I was overcome with fear. Then Jesus stood by me and said, Do not fear, I am with you. Then I felt an extraordinary strength in my soul, which I cannot describe and, being a few steps from them, I said boldly and loudly, “Praised be Jesus Christ.” And they, stepping aside, responded, “for ever and ever. Amen.” As if struck by lightning, they bowed their heads, not even daring to look at me. After I had passed, I could hear some malicious comments. Ever since that time, when this person sees me, he runs away in order not to meet me and I, thanks to the Lord, have been left in peace…

After Holy Mass, I went out to the garden to make my meditation, since there were not yet any patients in the garden at this time, and so I felt at ease. As I was meditating on the blessings of God, my heart was burning with a love so strong that it seemed my breast would burst. Suddenly Jesus stood before me and said, what are you doing here so early? I answered, “I am thinking of You, of Your mercy and Your goodness toward us. And You, Jesus what are You doing here?” I have come out to meet you, to lavish new graces on you. I am looking for souls who would like to receive My grace.

During Vespers today, the Lord gave me to know how very pleased He is with a pure and free heart. I felt that it is God’s delight to look into such a heart… but such hearts are knightly hearts; their life is a constant battle…

On my way to the veranda, I went into the chapel for a moment. My heart was plunged in profound adoration, praising God’s incomprehensible goodness and His mercy. Then I heard these words in my soul: I am and will be for you such as you praise Me for being. You shall experience My goodness, already in this life and then, to the full, in the life to come.

O Christ, I am most delighted when I see that You are loved, and that Your praise and glory resound, especially the praise of Your mercy. O Christ, to the last moment of my life, I will not stop glorifying Your goodness and mercy. With every drop of my blood, with every beat of my heart, I glorify Your mercy. I long to be entirely transformed into a hymn of Your Glory. When I find myself on my deathbed, may the last beat of my heart be a loving hymn in praise of Your unfathomable mercy.

Today the Lord said to me, you shall make a three-day retreat before the coming of the Holy Spirit. I Myself will direct you. You shall not follow any of the rules required for retreats or use any books for meditation. Your task is to listen attentively to My words. For spiritual reading you shall read one chapter from the Gospel of St. John.
[Here occurs a space of a half page in the original Notebook]


 

RETURN TO TOP

 

 CATHOLIC  TEACHING/CONVICTION/TESTIMONY

   

Live-in Love: Till Inconvenience Do Us Apart

by Mitch Finley (Our Sunday Visitor)
M

arty and Heather are recent college graduates who grew up in Catholic families. They do not attend Mass every Sunday, but they still consider themselves to be Catholics. Heather and Marty care for each other a great deal, and they speak of love. In fact, they care so much for each other that they decided to share an apartment. They have been sexually active for six months, and they figure living together will help them save money while getting to know each other better. If things work out, later they plan to discuss marriage. For now, they view living together as a trial to see if they are "compatible."

Marty and Heather's arrangement is not unusual nowadays. There is no longer a social taboo against unmarried couples living together, especially if they say they are thinking of marriage. The sociologists, with their inclination to avoid even a hint of moral judgment about anything, call it "cohabitation." Earlier generations, not so reluctant to judge, called it "shacking up," or "living in sin."

On the face of it, cohabitation sounds like a sensible idea. Why not work out the details of "setting up housekeeping" and testing sexual compatibility before making the leap into marriage? Isn't it better for a couple to find out if they get along before making a permanent commitment? Doesn't it make sense that living together is an excellent form of marriage preparation? What difference does "a piece of paper" (the marriage license) make, anyway? Isn't it just a formality?

As it turns out, cohabitation is a dangerous idea. Now that the so-called sexual revolution is more than 20 years old, researchers have had a chance to study the phenomenon of cohabitation, and the news is not good. It turns out that the "old-fashioned" customs of sexual abstinence and living apart before marriage are based on considerable common sense.

Two recent books summarize the scientific research that supports the old-fashioned way: "Ten Stupid Things Women Do to Mess Up Their Lives," by Laura Schlessinger (Villard Books, an imprint of Random House, 1994), and "Marriage Savers," by Michael J. McManus (Zondervan, 1993).

Truth Be Told

The truth of the matter, according to this research, is that cohabitation is bad for the individuals involved, bad for relationships based on love and bad for the future of marriages.

McManus presents some important statistics:

-Yale University sociologist Neil Bennett and his colleagues found in 1988 that cohabitating couples were 80 percent more likely to separate or divorce than were couples who had not lived together before marriage.

- In 1983, a study by the National Council on Family Relations, which focused on more than 300 newlywed couples, discovered that those who "lived together" before marriage were less happy after they married.

Women complained, in particular, about the quality of communication after the wedding.

- The 1989. National Survey of Families and Households reported, "Unions begun by cohabitation are almost twice as likely to dissolve within 10 years compared to all first marriages: 57 percent to 30 percent."

McManus adds that even if a couple does not cohabitate, but are sexually active prior to marriage, that is still a red flag for the future of the marriage.

The survey McManus cited focused on women, but the implications are clear for both men and women: "Joan Kahn and Kathryn London studied 2,746 women in the National Survey of Family Growth and measured the odds. 'Among white women first married between 1965 and 1985, virgin brides were less likely to have dissolved their marriages through separation or divorce than women who had not been virgins at marriage,' they reported in November 1991."

How much less likely? The percentages are mind-boggling. Couples who were sexually active prior to marriage have a divorce rate 53 percent to 71 percent higher than couples who were not sexually active.

According to McManus: "Marriage is one shoe you cannot try on before you wear it!"

Schlessinger, a marriage and family therapist, agrees that statistical studies prove cohabitation is a bad idea.

A U.S. survey of 13,000 adults revealed that couples who cohabitated prior to marriage were one-third more likely to separate or divorce within 10 years. A Canadian national survey of 5,300 respondents reported that those who lived together before marriage were 54 percent more likely to divorce within 15 years.

But young couples often believe they will be the exception to the statistical rule. Granted, there is no guarantee that if a given couple lives together before marriage they will end up in divorce court.

"There are those successful transitions," Schlessinger acknowledged. "But it is not the rule. So why are you willing to play Russian roulette with your life? Why? Desperation. Fear of not having somebody--of not having a life if a man [or woman] doesn't want you."

Instead, why not wait and grow in maturity, independence and security-of-self, Schlessinger and others now advise. This can be difficult to do, especially if you are young, emotionally needy and wanting to escape an unhappy past. It's tough, but the potential payoff, in the long run, is huge.

Maturity Levels

Schlessinger believes cohabitation can retard a person's maturity. A young person's primary task in life is to become a mature person.

Who are you? What do you believe? What do you want to live for? These are essential questions young people need to answer before making a lifelong commitment.

Personal maturity doesn't benefit from living with someone. "Only you can make you happy," Schlessinger said. When a young person blindly leaps for another person, that individual is likely to repeat whatever it is they were trying to get away from.

Denial is often a major factor in the choice to cohabitate, according to Schlessinger. Young people are likely to deny their own needs as well as what the other person is really like. Indeed, Schlessinger said, "living-in can equal giving in." Maturity and healthy self-esteem are based on the will to overcome circumstances, not on giving in to being overcome by another.

Marriage requires a solid foundation. Having sex before marriage, and living with someone with no commitment and no shared life plan, Schlessinger said, are "the behaviors of basically immature, let-me-feel-good-right-now-because-I-want-it-therefore-it-is kind of people." A marriage is far less likely to succeed between two people who never learned to delay gratification, which is what cohabitation is about.

Good decisions require objectivity. When a relationship turns into having sex and living together before marriage, it makes it far more difficult to have the objectivity needed to make good decisions. Premarital sex and cohabitation deprive couples of the distance from each other they need to make a wise choice to marry or not to marry. Sexual feelings can easily be mistaken for love.

"Dating--not living-in--is supposed to be about learning and discerning," Schlessinger said. "Dating is supposed to be a kind of lease with option--so don't get sexual and cohabitate right away and change the meaning of dating to a lease-with-premature-obligations situation."

Men and women tend to live together for different reasons. For men, cohabitation is a convenience, Schlessinger said. Women, on the other hand, often kid themselves with the thought that living together will give them a chance to get a close-up look at a potential mate.

Not true, according to Schlessinger. "Women move in to be protected, taken care of, to be wanted," she said. "And when you are in that mind-set, you can't for a moment wonder (especially not loud) if you even want the guy-you're too busy making sure he wants you."

What can be done? Tactics vary among those who work with engaged couples who are living together. Some ignore it. Others give the couples copies of articles like this one and leave the choice to them.

Some members of the clergy, however, refuse to knowingly witness the marriage of any cohabitating couple. They tell cohabitating couples they must separate if they want to be married in the Church. Is this a hard-hearted tactic likely to drive couples further away from the Church? Or is it "tough love"?

Some couples respond: "We can't afford to separate. Besides, it's only two months until our wedding." A parish council willing to put its money where its mouth is may reply that if it's a financial burden to separate the parish will help.

However, in such cases few couples ask for this help, explained McManus. And the result for couples who agree to separate? "Weeks after separating they say, 'The quality of our relationship has never been better. Our love continues to grow and amaze us.'"

 

RETURN TO TOP

 

Monthly Index              General Archive 2008

General Archive 2007
General Archive 2006

General Archive 2005

General Archive 2004

 

Hit Counter
Hits since 3/16/2004

Màn điện toán toàn cầu của Thiếu Nhi Fatima được bắt đầu với trang Main từ ngày 9/12/1999,

nhưng mãi tới Mùa Hè 2001 mới tạm xong,

cuối cùng đã được chỉnh trang về cả hình thức lẫn nội dung từ mùa hè năm 2002,

để rồi chính thức tái ra mắt vào ngày 25/3/2003 cho đến nay.

 

TNFatima.org do Thiếu Nhi Fatima chủ trương và thực hiện

Mọi ý kiến đóng góp xin gửi về Webmaster